That's great, it ACTUALLY gives me a desire to own a mac XD
What the disaster model?
I was thinking the Pip model. A comp that bites might keep idiots from messing up my system XD
Man oh man, if they sold those I would buy an Abel one without hesitation. Or should I get a Pip one? Decisions.
*gets a get-well-soon card for Amber's computer*
~Keaton the Black Jackal
...<<...>>... *steals the Abel one*
On another note, cute update indeed. But PCs are still for me. Or should I say, my whole family as well. :rolleyes
So would Fa'Lina be an 8 core Intel iMow?
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j5/Cogidubnus/worth1000.jpg)
Shouldn't he be holding an alien probe instead of a gun? I mean, that's closer to what Microsoft has done and will continue to do....
agreed, Microsoft = B.O.H.I.C.A
wouldn't these models make Great forum avatars ?
Quote from: Valynth on June 15, 2007, 11:56:07 PM
Shouldn't he be holding an alien probe instead of a gun? I mean, that's closer to what Microsoft has done and will continue to do....
Well, other than the microsoft logo there, there's nothing in it that links specifically to microsoft, especially since we're talking "PC" here and not "Windows".
Yeah, people. Ever heard of "Linux" or other open source operation systems?
I used to have a iMac like that, but it died last year and it made me sad. D:
Now I have a Blue and White G3 with really pathetic innards. 384MB of RAM, OH GOD WHY?
I want to get at least a G4 so I can upgrade to OSX Tiger. I wonder if the G4 can take other sticks of RAM besides PC 100.
[/17-year-old female mac nerd talking smart and confusing everyone because she won't STFU]
s'ok, Mashi. There's enough other geeks here that we understand you easily... ;-]
You are starting to make me drool. What I'm looking forward to is one of the new Intel Mac's so that I can load it with Parallels and then install Linux, Solaris, Windows (reluctantly), and an Amiga emulator (I have two Amigas so that I can legally use the copies of the ROM's.) I am now going to dig up my O'Reilly Windows Annoyances t-shirt and go to a computer club meeting.
I was once walking through a local college campus when a person asked me if I was the person she was supposed to meet. I told her I wasn't, but I was curious why she selected me out of all the people around. She told me she was told to look for a six foot geek.
Ooh spots! :giggle I think this is the new imac colour .. colours? .. pattern?
Pip mac seems a little dangerous to me as well.
If you really want to use one for a avatar, sweet talk Darkmoon. He drew all five fully and layered them into the comic. He might save one in a conveniently usable form for you if properly lauded.
I'll take the Dan one. Even if the Pip one instantly makes me think of "Patamon".
The Abel one looks like it has chicken pox...
Macs are evil, you've got to keep a tight rein on them. When I plugged mine in, the first thing it did was break into next door's wireless network and start to download things. >:3
That's not evil. That's awesome.
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on June 16, 2007, 02:10:39 AM
Quote from: Valynth on June 15, 2007, 11:56:07 PM
Shouldn't he be holding an alien probe instead of a gun? I mean, that's closer to what Microsoft has done and will continue to do....
Well, other than the microsoft logo there, there's nothing in it that links specifically to microsoft, especially since we're talking "PC" here and not "Windows".
Considering is says "Microsoft" at the bottom of the image that is on the forum and we all know who Apple is targeting.
This was from Slashdot, in a recent thread about the Windows port of the Safari browser, which originally shipped with a number of extremely dangerous bugs.
Mac: Hello, I'm a Mac...
PC: ...and I'm a PC.
Mac is looking through a small viewfinder, looking very absorbed
PC: Hey Mac.
Mac: Yeah?
PC: What are you doing?
Mac: I'm browsing the internet with Safari.
PC: I do the same thing with IE.
Mac: You should try Safari. It's fast, secure, and easy to use.
Mac hands the viewfinder to PC
PC: Oh, thanks.
PC looks into the viewfinder and keels over, dead
Mac shrugs
(Original ref: http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=238189&cid=19474175 )
*sigh* I guess I'm just going to keep on being a PC devotee.
Always have used PC, guess I always will.
However....I looked over the specs of the higher end Macs, and wondered just why the gaming companies haven't taken advantage of that? I mean......holy frig! Macs are insanely powerful (if you make them that way).
THey could be the tr00 gaming rigs.
*cough*
Ah well, I'll just be content to do as the tentacles command me.
One of he reasons is that Mac mice only one mouse button. One of my friends recently went into a long, eloquent, and LOUD monologue, expressed in so many ways, on just just how much he HATES MACS. One of the main focuses of his rant was the one mouse button problem. I almost couldn't stand because I was laughing so hard for about as long as he was ranting. I think it went on for at least a full five minutes.
Do they still have only one mouse button?
*remembers old joke*
"Name ONE thing that your PC can do that my Mac can't."
"Right click."
Quote from: BillBuckner on June 16, 2007, 11:45:49 AM
Do they still have only one mouse button?
I don't remember. This one didn't have a mouse at all, so it's got a generic 3-button optical one. Not being able to right-click would suck.
Quote from: Tapewolf on June 16, 2007, 11:48:34 AM
Quote from: BillBuckner on June 16, 2007, 11:45:49 AM
Do they still have only one mouse button?
I don't remember. This one didn't have a mouse at all, so it's got a generic 3-button optical one. Not being able to right-click would suck.
Well, mine does. Because this is the old dead iMac's mouse. I meant to switch out. :{{
When I get my G3, I want all my hardware to match. Right now I have this Dell monitor...'cuse me a moment. *takes picture of desk* Mmm, that's one for the Facebooks.
Once I get that G4 I oh-so-want, I'm going to switch out this keyboard/mouse for a black set. Mac HQ has like, five billion of 'em. I love Mac HQ.
...On the original subject of meeses, I believe they do still have the one button.
And "right-clicking" on a Mac is actually control+click. I'm so used to it now I've forgotten how any PC works.
I LOVE
LAMP MAC.
Quote from: Tapewolf on June 16, 2007, 10:07:31 AM
Macs are evil, you've got to keep a tight rein on them. When I plugged mine in, the first thing it did was break into next door's wireless network and start to download things. >:3
interesting I did the same thing with my laptop XP proffesional computer.
(http://www.roomies-comic.com/comics/roomies-20061102.gif) (http://www.roomies-comic.com/comics/roomies-20061102.gif)
and here is my buddy Pyromancy's version
http://www.furaffinity.net/full/422257/
Edit: Just made the image clickable... Don't mind me. :-]
Yep, Macs still only have one mouse button, because the macs in question that my friend was ranting about were brand new(or at least they looked brand new)
the power macs are a joke if you get a Mac at all get a laptop that supports both.
Quote from: Valynth on June 16, 2007, 11:01:47 AM
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on June 16, 2007, 02:10:39 AM
Quote from: Valynth on June 15, 2007, 11:56:07 PM
Shouldn't he be holding an alien probe instead of a gun? I mean, that's closer to what Microsoft has done and will continue to do....
Well, other than the microsoft logo there, there's nothing in it that links specifically to microsoft, especially since we're talking "PC" here and not "Windows".
Considering is says "Microsoft" at the bottom of the image that is on the forum and we all know who Apple is targeting.
1. Which is NOT an image made my apple.
2. Nobody cares who they're targeting, it's the generalization that's to be concerned with. The PC is the PC. You can't just relabel him as Microsoft just because "we know who Apple is targeting"
Quote from: techmaster-glitch on June 16, 2007, 12:35:41 PM
Yep, Macs still only have one mouse button, because the macs in question that my friend was ranting about were brand new(or at least they looked brand new)
Macs can have two mouse button. It's just that the only mac mouse with two buttons that i've seen has a scroll wheel/whatever that is too small for words.
I always used a generic plug and play two button mouse on the mac I was using. Yay USB
Quote from: BillBuckner on June 16, 2007, 11:45:49 AM
Do they still have only one mouse button?
*remembers old joke*
"Name ONE thing that your PC can do that my Mac can't."
"Right click."
The default Imac mouse still has one button, but you can click either side of it, to emulate a right-click. The "scroll wheel" is also a fully two-axis trackball, which constantly feels like it's in serious need of lubrication.(the movement feels sandpapery.)
Technically, you've always been able to right-click on a Mac. You just have to set your macros so that the RMB sends the "Command+click" signal to the
PC computer
My primary complaints against Mac are that they're obscenely expensive(ever heard of a $72 Mac? I THOUGHT NOT! Granted, the $72 PC is anemic, and has to run on DSLinux, off of a flash drive), you can't build it yourself(and thereby do your own maintenance, as I do), and it doesn't have the gaming library that the PC has. Even if you use emulation, you're losing loads of performance just for your compatability.
[edit]McGuyver's iPhone (http://www.loadingreadyrun.com/videos/view/211/iPhone+Alternative)
As long as it does what it's supposed to - It's fine by me. I like Mac's better for some things, PC's for others.
After all - :ipod, anyone?
And I believe holding down on the click was effectively a right click. At least that's how my iBook worked. But here I am, operating XP, now.
But you know what's really cool? Firefox.
Firefox very > IE.
Safari... well, that's like in-between... And Firefox is FREE!
Windows version of Safari is apparently worse than IE. A monumental achievement.
Am I the only person on earth that didn't like Firefox?
I think it's rather average.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 16, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Am I the only person on earth that didn't like Firefox?
No.
I'm not one of them, but I gather they exist. :-] FWIW, the three main reasons I prefer Firefox is stability (for me) and consistency, and performance.
Once it's open, it beats the pants off IE in my experience. Plus it's consistent in interface across all the many and varied platforms I run (citrix, locally on debian, on laptop on debian, on windows desktops, just as a quick starting list) and vastly more extendable, and then there's the number of activex bugs available for IE...
As you might guess, though, if you prefer to run it, that's fine by me. And, seriously, folks, the rabid fringe who run around screaming that "IE is going to die, use Firefox now!" are the rabid fringe, and labelled so for a reason. Reasonable folk will advise, then STFU when you decline. *shrug*
Quote from: Nerikull on June 16, 2007, 11:39:16 AM
However....I looked over the specs of the higher end Macs, and wondered just why the gaming companies haven't taken advantage of that? I mean......holy frig! Macs are insanely powerful (if you make them that way).
THey could be the tr00 gaming rigs.
No, the most important part of gaming is the graphic power, and Mac graphics cards are limited compared to PCs. Standard on the Mac Pro is an 256MB GeForce 7300GT, which is lame for gaming. The equivalent for the PC is about $70. Better than Intel integrated graphics, but NOT what gamers want in a computer that starts at $2499... The only gaming card for the Macs is the Radeon X1900XT that is a $249 upgrade, and even that is blown away by the GeForce 8800GTS cards that are only available for PCs and start at $259 (after rebate) on Newegg.
Personally, I don't want to play full-screen games on my Mac. Or any computer at all. Nope, no downloading Psychonauts off GameTap for me! I hear the controls are awkward, and this might be so for any game. Screw joysticks. Those things are clunky.
For me, I'll stick with a simple MUSH or flash game. Or a game on a console. *hugs Psychonauts* My preeeciouuuussss.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 16, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Am I the only person on earth that didn't like Firefox?
My dad seems to think it's adware. He's not the kind of person to get confused on this sort of thing. He doesn't hate many things, but two things I'm fairly certain he absolutely loathes are...
1: game consoles hooked up to his TV
2: Firefox
I've seen porn made out of Firefox anthropomorphized; can IE or Safari make that boast?
Didn't think so.
I have one major reason for not switching to firefox. Besides not caring for it, I'm just too damn lazy to change to something else. Hell I'm still on normal MSN rather then switching to live messenger or the countless hundreds of other chat programs out there. I only got on AIM because half the people I meet at cons and junk all seem to be aim instead.
Quote from: Netami on June 16, 2007, 08:18:16 PM
I've seen porn made out of Firefox anthropomorphized; can IE or Safari make that boast?
Didn't think so.
:erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk :erk
......Rule 34 just doesn't joke around, does it?
The only thing I REALLY dislike about IE is that I seem to get spammy toolbars. I only need 3 toolbars - the menu bar, the address bar (which includes a mod-able search engine in Firefox, Yay.), and a bar for tabs, that disappears when I only have one tab.
IE tried to do tabs - It only made the whole program worse.
And my copy of firefox was skinned in "iFox" at one point. It's pretty cool. ^^
Reminds me to download the Wikipedia search engine mod on my laptop...
Quote from: Raist on June 16, 2007, 01:53:48 PMMy primary complaints against Mac are that they're obscenely expensive(ever heard of a $72 Mac? I THOUGHT NOT! Granted, the $72 PC is anemic, and has to run on DSLinux, off of a flash drive), you can't build it yourself(and thereby do your own maintenance, as I do), and it doesn't have the gaming library that the PC has.
So your complaint is that Macs aren't Windows PCs. :rolleyes
Quote from: Netrogo on June 16, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Am I the only person on earth that didn't like Firefox?
I don't dislike it, I just don't see why it deserves all the praise it gets. Firefox is better than IE, but only marginally so. It has better security than IE, but since my PC at work has supremely paranoid security settings, the security holes in IE aren't really an issue there. Performance-wise, Safari wins - it loads webpages much faster than both Firefox and IE (and IMO it also
looks better), but on rare occations Safari has issues with making certain bits of code work properly, which I've never seen Firefox have any trouble with. So really, there's pros and cons to all three of them.
I use firefox because it's not shiet like IE. It actually knows what proper webcode is and can render it. IE is incapable of meeting webstandards.
I could use Opera (and have on occasion), but when it boils down to a choice, I go with Firefox.
Quote from: Kazairl on June 16, 2007, 07:02:48 PM
...the most important part of gaming is the graphic power, and Mac graphics cards are limited compared to PCs. Standard on the Mac Pro is an 256MB GeForce 7300GT, which is lame for gaming. The equivalent for the PC is about $70. Better than Intel integrated graphics, but NOT what gamers want in a computer that starts at $2499... The only gaming card for the Macs is the Radeon X1900XT that is a $249 upgrade, and even that is blown away by the GeForce 8800GTS cards that are only available for PCs and start at $259 (after rebate) on Newegg.
The only thing holding them back is lack of drivers. Other than the fact that (in my opinion) all PCIe cards should support EFI (and totally drop the aging BIOS support. Stupid Microsoft stifling innovation), there is the OS-level drivers. Since Intel-based Macs are very similar to PCs, that's about the only thing that is stopping the new DX10 cards from running on OS X.
I don't like Firefox! I use Seamonkey!
The linux version. :mwaha
Wow I must be one of the only people who has no problems with IE. The new tabs feature works great and I use it all the time. I never get spammy toolbars because whenever I go anywhere or install anything I actually READ what it says rather then just hitting okay until it goes away.
I've never had problems with Interent Explorer either. It works fine for me.
Quote from: techmaster-glitch on June 17, 2007, 08:23:43 AM
I've never had problems with Interent Explorer either. It works fine for me.
I mean no disrespect, but that's just not true. It was chronically broken until V7 - the PNG reader was about 6-8 years behind the rest of the world. If you've never seen it fail, it's either because you never realised that what you were seeing was broken, or because the sites you visited were deliberately stuck in the past because of IE. Probably a combination of the two.
Xze's new avatar is a good example. It is using alpha blending - the avatar I made for James a while ago did too. That was before IE7 came out I think, but I'd got to the point where I just couldn't bring myself to care about people using IE anymore.
Here's a quick example which I made just over a year ago:
(http://www.jpmorris.force9.co.uk/stuff/alphasplodge.png)
In IE7 and basically every other browser apart from IE<7, you should have a circle fading out into the current forum background. On IE6 you will get a grey backdrop because alpha blending is broken. That more than anything else is what I hated about IE - it declared darkness the standard instead of fixing the lightbulb.
Of course, I could never get the thing to run on Linux either...
Er... Sorry, but I don't find PNG transparency to be a really pressing issue.
That red to background circle worked fine for me.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 08:59:00 AM
That red to background circle worked fine for me.
Good. Which version was it?
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on June 17, 2007, 08:50:42 AM
Er... Sorry, but I don't find PNG transparency to be a really pressing issue.
In the grand scheme of things, no. But it's the quickest and easiest to demonstrate. And it is still inexcusable that it took IE that many years to catch up with every other browser.
**EDIT**
For some reason I forgot to include it inline :rolleyes
I dunno, I'm just on the newest update of IE.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 09:17:28 AM
I dunno, I'm just on the newest update of IE.
They've probably slipstreamed it in then. Which is good. I'll try it at work and see what happens there.
IE7 is still broken when it comes to webrendering. Just because most sites have found way to workaround the issues doesn't mean that the situation in fine. It just means that people are propagating a broken system.
Oh, and most people that go "IE works just fine for me," are still using IE6. Just fyi.
Or we don't do enough with it to see these errors everyone keeps going on about.
No, trust me, you don't have to do anything to see the errors IE experiences. Most of them are pretty basic. It's just that most websites, as I said above, have numerous workarounds going just to fix IEs issues.
Microsoft have promised™ that they would comply to standards by IE8.
I smell the power of evil..rising
Quote from: Zedd on June 17, 2007, 01:29:31 PM
I smell the power of evil..rising
You say that as if it were a bad thing :mwaha
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 01:39:11 PM
You say that as if it were a bad thing :mwaha
It's not my evil. Therefore it's bad by definition. ;-]
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on June 17, 2007, 02:17:47 PM
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 01:39:11 PM
You say that as if it were a bad thing :mwaha
It's not my evil. Therefore it's bad by definition. ;-]
Do you want to wait back at the Tardis then eh?
And here I was, under the impression that an iMow was like an iPod.
Oh, well, too late to fix it now...
Behold the iMeep, as concocted horribly using a touch pad and paint.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v286/Netrogo/iMeep.jpg)
:|
Quote from: Tapewolf on June 17, 2007, 08:42:39 AMI mean no disrespect, but that's just not true. It was chronically broken until V7 - the PNG reader was about 6-8 years behind the rest of the world.
Well, of course! PNG is an open source alternative to patent-encumbered GIF. Microsoft is going to deliberately cripple it.
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on June 17, 2007, 08:50:42 AMEr... Sorry, but I don't find PNG transparency to be a really pressing issue.
Transparency is a major issue in web design. If you can't do it with PNGs, you have to do it with GIFs, which are limited to 256 colors, which is often unacceptable.
Tapewolf--did IE allow GIF transparency?
Yes.
In as much as it "allows" anything, anyway...
Quote from: superluser on June 17, 2007, 04:47:25 PMTransparency is a major issue in web design. If you can't do it with PNGs, you have to do it with GIFs, which are limited to 256 colors, which is often unacceptable.
If it's so important, why didn't MNG catch on in the same way?
Quote from: Netami on June 16, 2007, 08:18:16 PM
I've seen porn made out of Firefox anthropomorphized; can IE or Safari make that boast?
Didn't think so.
I've seen ie and safari porn
Quote from: thegayhare on June 17, 2007, 08:18:17 PM
Quote from: Netami on June 16, 2007, 08:18:16 PM
I've seen porn made out of Firefox anthropomorphized; can IE or Safari make that boast?
Didn't think so.
I've seen ie and safari porn
Thus the reason for rule 34 >.< I saw porn of someone doing an IE window once.
I've also seen ashtray porn, Ipod porn, hovercraft porn, artillery porn, Vista porn, and more
Quote from: techmaster-glitch on June 17, 2007, 08:23:43 AM
I've never had problems with Interent Explorer either. It works fine for me.
Well your lucky.... I only switched to firefox because for some
f**ked up [sorry ment to say stupid] reason my IE won't let me see youtube videos....or anything that has to do with flash....which is 99% of what i do online.... *help would be loved*
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on June 17, 2007, 07:12:59 PMIf it's so important, why didn't MNG catch on in the same way?
Good question. If I had to guess, I'd say that MNG is more recent than PNG, and I think MNGs are typically much larger than GIF89.
I will warn you all with one short message
ENTER ZUUL BUILDING.
Hopfeuly all things will be needed
whatthefuck
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 03:56:43 PM
Behold the iMeep, as concocted horribly using a touch pad and paint.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v286/Netrogo/iMeep.jpg)
That could totally be am iPod skin with thingies sticking out of it. I'd buy it, if it was for a 30G video.
Quote from: thegayhare
I've also seen ashtray porn, Ipod porn, hovercraft porn, artillery porn, Vista porn, and more
W...T...F... Rule 34 or not, I do believe this sums it up:
Quote from: Tori from Muthbusters
It boggles the miiiiind.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 03:56:43 PM
Behold the iMeep, as concocted horribly using a touch pad and paint.
YES.
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 08:18:15 AM
Wow I must be one of the only people who has no problems with IE. The new tabs feature works great and I use it all the time. I never get spammy toolbars because whenever I go anywhere or install anything I actually READ what it says rather then just hitting okay until it goes away.
D'ooooh, you did NOT just go there... :nono
I have a serious issue with reading legal documents that is clearly listed in this legal document about my ADD. Yesh. Usually it's my little brothers who download 'em. That, and my computers come pre-packaged with spam. Like the Yahoo! toolbar, the now unnecessary Google Toolbar, and all sorts of crap that my brothers download.
Along with the fact they've defaced the PC with a wallpaper of Starcraft 2. They worship it every day at noon until it comes out. Ruins lunch, I don't want to think about Zergs and Terrans and how creepishly sexyish Kerrigan looks. And I don't typically those of my own gender sexy.
And I would splurge and go on in some unrelated passion about a new webcomic I liked here, but I'll save you.
Afterthought: This is going to be one for my "Kryptic's ADD Rants" files. I need to keep track of these. They're confusing but entertaining when I look back on 'em.
And also, many programs and OS have anthropomorphic varieties. (http://ostan-collections.net/wiki/Avatar_Gallery)
I'm tempted to post the Wii mote one I just found... it's not dirty but it does swear...
and my favorite landing craft one is mildly dirty but you can't see anything other then some embarrassed tanks
Quote from: Rambon on June 17, 2007, 09:01:00 PM
Quote from: techmaster-glitch on June 17, 2007, 08:23:43 AM
I've never had problems with Interent Explorer either. It works fine for me.
Well your lucky.... I only switched to firefox because for some f**ked up [sorry ment to say stupid] reason my IE won't let me see youtube videos....or anything that has to do with flash....which is 99% of what i do online.... *help would be loved*
Must be your flash installation's fault.
Redundant, or sensitive message deleted
Quote from: Kryptic on June 17, 2007, 11:07:15 PM
D'ooooh, you did NOT just go there... :nono
I have a serious issue with reading legal documents that is clearly listed in this legal document about my ADD. Yesh. Usually it's my little brothers who download 'em. That, and my computers come pre-packaged with spam. Like the Yahoo! toolbar, the now unnecessary Google Toolbar, and all sorts of crap that my brothers download.
Along with the fact they've defaced the PC with a wallpaper of Starcraft 2. They worship it every day at noon until it comes out. Ruins lunch, I don't want to think about Zergs and Terrans and how creepishly sexyish Kerrigan looks. And I don't typically those of my own gender sexy.
And I would splurge and go on in some unrelated passion about a new webcomic I liked here, but I'll save you.
Afterthought: This is going to be one for my "Kryptic's ADD Rants" files. I need to keep track of these. They're confusing but entertaining when I look back on 'em.
And also, many programs and OS have anthropomorphic varieties. (http://ostan-collections.net/wiki/Avatar_Gallery)
Oh I don't read the legal jargon part of those things. That never changes and it's always block of text. What I was refering to are the people who, when installing something, just click okay repeatedly until it goes away. Usually the google toolbar and such are ONE full page of the installation process so all it would take is three seconds of paying attention and poof No Toolbar.
This is me installing something...
*Opens program and install shield loads*
Blah blah thank you *clicks okay*
Blah blah stuff about program *clicks okay*
Blah blah legal stuff *clicks accept then okay*
Blah blah oh sunva... *Checks no on stupid toolbar then clicks okay*
blah blah done *clicks finish*
Considering I have ADD and I can notice this, someone would have to either be way too impatient, three years old, or an idiot to NOT notice when the full page of the install thing says GOOGLE TOOLBAR. God the things usually have Google's full logo which is BRIGHT FREAKING RAINBOW COLOURED LETTERS nobody with ADD can say they don't notice a bright colored freaking thing suddenly popping up on their screen.
I use Firefox because, I have to constantly go back and forth from Mac to PC, and it is nice to be able to have bookmarks synchronize back and forth from computer to computer, and have the same basic layout and setup on all computers I use.
Quote from: Kryptic on June 17, 2007, 11:07:15 PM
Along with the fact they've defaced the PC with a wallpaper of Starcraft 2. They worship it every day at noon until it comes out. Ruins lunch, I don't want to think about Zergs and Terrans and how creepishly sexyish Kerrigan looks. And I don't typically those of my own gender sexy.
Did you just imply you don't care about starcraft 2?!?!
Quote from: Whitemagebishieboy on June 18, 2007, 04:35:48 PM
Quote from: Kryptic on June 17, 2007, 11:07:15 PM
Along with the fact they've defaced the PC with a wallpaper of Starcraft 2. They worship it every day at noon until it comes out. Ruins lunch, I don't want to think about Zergs and Terrans and how creepishly sexyish Kerrigan looks. And I don't typically those of my own gender sexy.
Did you just imply you don't care about starcraft 2?!?!
Not when forced upon me.
I'm more of a Warcraft girl myself... And only sparingly. I tend to suck vacuum-style when I play those kinda games. If I'm going to play strategy, Fire Emblem's more my style.
Quote from: Kryptic on June 18, 2007, 05:13:34 PM
Not when forced upon me.
I'm more of a Warcraft girl myself... And only sparingly. I tend to suck vacuum-style when I play those kinda games. If I'm going to play strategy, Fire Emblem's more my style.
NICE A ANOTHER WARCRAFT GIRL!
Redundant page Deleted
Quote from: kaskar on June 19, 2007, 04:36:40 AM
Quote from: Netrogo on June 17, 2007, 03:56:43 PM
:rolleyes Behold the iMeep, as concocted horribly using a touch pad and paint.
8) But think of all the crud that has been written in the land of Microsoft, that has gone out to plague the world ...
( Not all of MS is bad, some is quite good. They just sometimes " Badge " inadaquete stuff as their own ... )
( Also what seems to be a seven year obselecence cycle can be a bit a bit of an issue ... )
I agree that we do over harp on MS at times considering how many of us still use their stuff regardless.
Also Kaskar. Why did you quote my post to say that? What you said had NOTHING to do with my post about the horrible iMeep.
8) Sorry about that ...
Brilliant IT consultant Kaskar strikes again
Quote from: kaskar on June 19, 2007, 07:56:04 AM
8) Sorry about that ... The point that has to be remembered is that software and such is often " badged "
from another source ... Brandnames become mere buzz words for sales ... The iMeep would be a good example
if it was a real product ...
Kaskar you... you... I REALLY don't know what to say anymore. You're like a kid with a peg board trying to fit the square peg in the round hole, and justifying why you're putting the square one in the round hole rather then admit you're wrong. I mean we go off topic in our discussions here, discussions do that. But you just seem to be talking to yourself in range of others.
And seriously WHY do you keep adding emotes INTO your quotes. When you quoted me you put a rolling eye emote in there. I didn't roll my eyes so why did you do that.
A quote is a way of pointing out something someone else said if I go
Quote from: kaskar on June 19, 2007, 07:56:04 AM
Durrr I r Kaskar me am stuff. *drools*
You didn't say that but through the wonders of quoting I've made it seem that you did. DON'T PUT WORDS IN OTHER PEOPLE'S MOUTHS!!! If you're going to quote then have some respect in it and do it right.
Quote from: kaskar on June 19, 2007, 04:36:40 AM( Also what seems to be a seven year obselecence cycle can be a bit a bit of an issue ... )
Take it up with the IRS. The CLADR tables fully depreciate most consumer electronics in five years under the GDS form of MACRS.
:rolleyes I apologise to all. Just something there hit a raw nerve on me ...
Let microsoft strike all the nerves it wants, rant to your hearts content. Like I said though, don't muck with the quotes.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what people are talking about here. >_<
*Wishes that the random non-comic updates didn't get removed when the next comic gets added*
:mowmeep Is the new iMow going to be made in a similar way to the origional Mows in # 363 ?
I have a PC and a PSP which I download music to it from a Music site which I will not name for purposes of lawsuit and stuff and I have a brand spanking new Commodore 64.
BUt the PC rocks than the Mac if you know how to cannibilzed the inner workings and upgrade that puppy up then it will blow away Mac any day of the week.
Quote from: Goatmon on June 25, 2007, 02:25:46 AM
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what people are talking about here. >_<
*Wishes that the random non-comic updates didn't get removed when the next comic gets added*
They tend to end up in the bonus comics section.
Of course, that depends on Amber going out of her way to update the Bonus Comics section, and, honestly, she's not having a good enough month to get the time to do that... :-/
If you wait, eventually someone will post a link to it :-)