Re: Rules for the Merchant's Corner

Started by JackTheCubiWolf, August 19, 2009, 03:41:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JackTheCubiWolf

I'm back, and tired.

Tapewolf

Replying to something 10 months old isn't really a great idea...

J.P. Morris, Chief Engineer DMFA Radio Project * IT-HE * D-T-E


llearch n'n'daCorna

It'd be more acceptable if it was a question about the rules, rather than random commentary. Specifically in that thread, I mean.
Thanks for all the images | Unofficial DMFA IRC server
"We found Scientology!" -- The Bad Idea Bears

Tapewolf

Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on August 20, 2009, 05:55:05 AM
It'd be more acceptable if it was a question about the rules, rather than random commentary. Specifically in that thread, I mean.

Agreed - I knew there was something I'd forgotten to add.
To clarify, the rules thread is left unlocked in case people have queries about the rules.  Those are welcome, but continuing idle chatter from last November is not really the idea.

J.P. Morris, Chief Engineer DMFA Radio Project * IT-HE * D-T-E


JackTheCubiWolf

O, I didn't realize it was that old. Sorry.
I'm back, and tired.

Zina

There's usually red text that says "this thread is more than a month old" or something like that before you make your post.
Please be more mindful in the future.

JackTheCubiWolf

I'm back, and tired.

techmaster-glitch

yeah, that warning message doesn't seem to show for stickyed threads.
Avatar:AMoS



Turnsky

Quote from: JackTheCubiWolf on August 21, 2009, 01:43:22 AM
It didn't say that for me.

then you use your EYES and look at the last post date.  :B

Dragons, it's what's for dinner... with gravy and potatoes, YUM!
Sparta? no, you should've taken that right at albuquerque..

Tapewolf

Quote from: Turnsky on August 21, 2009, 06:11:34 AM
then you use your EYES and look at the last post date.  :B

I've seen worse.  On homerecording.com, people reply to posts from 2000 or so with disturbing frequency.

J.P. Morris, Chief Engineer DMFA Radio Project * IT-HE * D-T-E