RE 5/4/24 Saturnine Saturn

Started by Anders71, April 05, 2026, 11:34:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Anders71

April 05, 2026, 11:34:08 PM Last Edit: April 05, 2026, 11:59:24 PM by Anders71
It's been a crazy weekend but there's no way I was missing the chance to make that pun.

It's really kinda strange that tricksters keep assuming that the shadowslayer would automatically want to attack them. Like sure, 'I hate tricksters because them worshiping Jake means they're associated with the living shadow' makes sense in a vacuum, but so does 'I haven't developed any particular opinion on tricksters because I'm too busy making sure the living shadow doesn't kill everyone'. Or even 'I hate people who persecute tricksters and shapeshifters while pretending they're protecting people because they're total posures. Can't they see I'm doing the real work here?'
A central philosophical issue with worlds, possible or impossible, is how they represent what they represent. This is obviously connected to the problem of what kind of things they are. Perhaps impossible worlds are metaphysically different from possible worlds, and represent in a different way. Or perhaps they are metaphysically on par with possible worlds. Or, they may be taken as nonexistent objects. Or as abstract entities which represent by encoding...

ProfesseurRenard

#1
April 06, 2026, 01:48:19 AM
Guess Tricksters are no more immune to jumping to conclusions than any other mortal in LaRaGa.

Anders71

#2
April 06, 2026, 06:27:09 AM
Quote from: ProfesseurRenard on April 06, 2026, 01:48:19 AMGuess Tricksters are no more immune to jumping to conclusions than any other mortal in LaRaGa.
It's the jumping and staying that suprises me. Like at this point Saturn has made multiple overtures to people who are tricksters, she's said multiple times that she in some sense identifies with tricksters, and she's clearly trying to repair her relationship with jinx.
A central philosophical issue with worlds, possible or impossible, is how they represent what they represent. This is obviously connected to the problem of what kind of things they are. Perhaps impossible worlds are metaphysically different from possible worlds, and represent in a different way. Or perhaps they are metaphysically on par with possible worlds. Or, they may be taken as nonexistent objects. Or as abstract entities which represent by encoding...
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions