The Clockwork Mansion

Underground Warehouse => Abandoned Mine => Topic started by: Jasae Bushae on April 18, 2010, 02:06:19 AM

Title: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Jasae Bushae on April 18, 2010, 02:06:19 AM
Greetings! I stumbled upon this ages back and its been bugging me incessantly! I was wondering if it was ever answered
http://missmab.com/Comics/Vol_903.php

The question basically being: how would the offspring between a biped and a quadraped work out.
She said in the comic she would answer it when the shock wore out but with the lack of a follow up question i was wondering if she had at some point covered it in a news update or in the forum and if so, did anyone recall the answer?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 18, 2010, 04:57:12 AM
http://missmab.com/Demo/HG02.php maybe?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Jasae Bushae on April 18, 2010, 10:05:52 AM
That doesn't really count since cubis born from a cubi and non cubi parent genetically speaking simply take the properties of the non cubi in the relationship and become cubis when they hit puberty ^^;
So dans bipedalness isnt an issue in his and matildas love child so much as the fact that hes a cubi

Which brings me back to my question. How would it work if a bipedal and a quadraped had a kiddie and the whole cubi thing wasnt in the equation?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Lisky on April 18, 2010, 11:17:34 AM
If we go by real life genetics, it depends on whether or not the trait is recessive or dominant... If quadrupedal is dominant, assuming both are pure-species, and compatible, genetically, then the resulting child would always be quadrupedal.  If the quadrupedal trait is recessive, and we go by the same previous assumption, then the resulting child will always be bipedal. 

I could go on, but beyond that point, things get far more murky, and difficult to describe.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Suwako on April 18, 2010, 11:18:01 AM
In actual nature, as in human nature certain features are more 'potent' than others, by which I mean that often some features are dominant in genetics. Children of a family often have all the dominant features of their parents, this said it is not always the case, however it often is. So by going by this logic it would result in either a bipedal or a quad-pedal.

Underdeveloped limbs are of course an option, however genetically seen it might be an unfavourable one, even to the parent. Really viewing this topic at all with analysis and logic is silly anyway, it is a fantasy world and Amber decides whats what in it. In actual live there are no quad-pedal animals that are known to produce offspring with humans due to being too different genetically.  

inshort;  The child in all likelihood would take whatever feature is dominant instead of forming truly 'mutant' limbs.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Jasae Bushae on April 18, 2010, 11:48:46 AM
yush i know how normal genetics work in that sense though its hard to imagine whether quadrapedal or bipedal could necesarily could be considered dominant or not traits

and yush i know its silly to over analyze it but i was curious if Amber had her own answer to this since she in this world is the last say :3
like that whole 'can shapeshifters have babies' debate that she finally weighed in on and gave a clear no

and since that was such a long time ago I was wondering if she had answered it in the forums and if so, if anyone was here to remember it
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Amber Williams on April 18, 2010, 12:43:18 PM
I tend to go by the general rules of artist genetics:  It would work out to whatever I thought looked better when I was drawing it. :U
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Bjalf on April 18, 2010, 12:56:41 PM
Quote from: Amber Williams on April 18, 2010, 12:43:18 PM
I tend to go by the general rules of artist genetics:  It would work out to whatever I thought looked better when I was drawing it. :U

So, your pencil is a dominant trait?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Suwako on April 18, 2010, 01:05:41 PM
Quote from: Bjalf on April 18, 2010, 12:56:41 PM
Quote from: Amber Williams on April 18, 2010, 12:43:18 PM
I tend to go by the general rules of artist genetics:  It would work out to whatever I thought looked better when I was drawing it. :U

So, your pencil is a dominant trait?

Obviously. Or perhaps Amberination?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 18, 2010, 01:09:07 PM
In RL science.

This question would be like asking If a Great Dane and Chihuahua can have puppies.  It would be Pure magic if the male-great dane and the female  chihuahua  were even able mate naturally.  And the other way might work if the little guy can work fast while the Great Dane bitch is  her ass laughing at him.

PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Jasae Bushae on April 18, 2010, 01:14:55 PM
Woo! i got an answer! pencil genetics andamberination are the answer!

and i actually saw such a mix once i think ^^; it was a midget sized great dane and i swear the only one ive seen like it since
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: AmigaDragon on April 18, 2010, 01:49:09 PM
Quote from: Tytaj on April 18, 2010, 11:18:01 AM
inshort;  The child in all likelihood would take whatever feature is dominant instead of forming truly 'mutant' limbs.

Or considering fantasy settings, you might even end up with a 'taur.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Suwako on April 18, 2010, 02:04:42 PM
Quote from: AmigaDragon on April 18, 2010, 01:49:09 PM
Quote from: Tytaj on April 18, 2010, 11:18:01 AM
inshort;  The child in all likelihood would take whatever feature is dominant instead of forming truly 'mutant' limbs.

Or considering fantasy settings, you might even end up with a 'taur.

Perhaps, though it normal genetics that would make absolutely no sense.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 18, 2010, 04:29:45 PM
Quote from: Tytaj on April 18, 2010, 02:04:42 PM
Quote from: AmigaDragon on April 18, 2010, 01:49:09 PM

Or considering fantasy settings, you might even end up with a 'taur.

Perhaps, though it normal genetics that would make absolutely no sense.

Six limbs are not in the normal genetics code for Earth... but a taur could make sense on physics side.  So long as the weight and heights are near horse ranges.

PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Suwako on April 18, 2010, 04:44:25 PM
Quote from: Prof B Hunnydew on April 18, 2010, 04:29:45 PM


Six limbs are not in the normal genetics code for Earth... but a taur could make sense on physics side.  So long as the weight and heights are near horse ranges.

PBH

But seeing as the torso is lengthened with additional bones wouldn't it account for additional weight? Of course one could supposable use hollow bones but still, a traditional set of limbs/muscles and everything would still count to more weight than the neck and ( whatever the section is called ) of a horse. Seeing as hands are tool carriers it would mean that the species would at least have use for these limbs and therefore would have developed a larger brain, which costs additional energy, seeing as 6 limbs themselves account for more energy as well one could gather that a creature with so many appendages would require a lot of food for energy. Later on in an established society the limbs and size of the creature might also be unnecessary, since they are more stationary and non-migrative  would having additional limbs for walking faster be very useful?

I think too much. 6 limbs would indeed be handy for faster travel but beside that; it seems that species as intelligent as we do not require speedy travel as far as I have seen, and a species that doesn't have much brainpower would not have need for additional grabbing limbs, I think.

of course, I am thinking out of earthen circumstances and do not account for the possibility for a creature to live on a planet where the gravity is lower and therefore there are larger prey to prey on. However, it could be just scaled up, which would mean that the 6 limbed creature would be relatively small compared to the others? Ugh.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 18, 2010, 06:03:49 PM
God and Goddess  How do I get into these messes....

Okay, I believe that some dual system would be develop in a Taur creature, but you wouldn't need everything twice...just two pairs of lung, two hearts and even a human stomach could help the equine torso to provide the energy to extra limbs.  Small intestines for meats/proteins.     High brain develop need a high protein diet, and high grain diet would to be passed on to the equine half.  The problem is that the small human mouth would require long grazing periods, and with small high protein snack throughout the day.  A grassland/forest environments could supply the need calories per day, if the herd move constantly over a large area.  The centaur creature would make more sense for a development of nomadic tribes,  but with advances in farming and grain production would make roaming tribes not as necessary, but if you evolve into the centaur, you can't lose your extra limbs so easily.

PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Naldru on April 18, 2010, 07:22:01 PM
There are many times that I have seen an animated gif in this forum that had a text that read something like "Every time you try to use science to explain a fantasy world, a cat girl dies."  When I see topics like this, I wish that that was in the list of smileys.  I actually worked out some cogent and appropriate arguments on this topic, but then found my computer saying "I'm sorry I can't let you do that Dave."  Which is curious since my name isn't Dave.

At which point I remembered who Dave was and what happened to him, and decided to attend this topic nevermore.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Anker Steadfast on April 19, 2010, 12:30:13 AM
Pencil Genetics is hereby the official answer to those questions. :D

As for the "would this or that require too much food/energy to work", there's a simple answer:

Magic!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Scow2 on April 19, 2010, 09:16:18 AM
Eh... the human mouth is large enough to feed the quadrupedal stomach of a taur... Anyone heard of Italian food?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 19, 2010, 10:37:21 AM
Quote from: Anker Steadfast on April 19, 2010, 12:30:13 AM
Pencil Genetics is hereby the official answer to those questions. :D

As for the "would this or that require too much food/energy to work", there's a simple answer:

Magic!

Really? 

Magic is a shortcut.. You need not go there first...anything is possible with enough time, and determination, and energy.  Look at the pyramids.... Enough people, and enough time. builded them over the desert.

PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 19, 2010, 10:54:01 AM
I think, in terms of the story, magic is a perfectly good explanation simply because this isn't relevant to the plot.  It's not really something you're going to encounter.  It's not something that really effects any of the characters directly (some might argue Dan and Matilda, but we've been told no one gets any) so it's really just kind of waving around theories of a magical world in an attempt to show that you can out logic/debate one another.  Besides, it's already been explained that the reason it would work out that way is because the artist decided it was so.  What more do you need?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 19, 2010, 10:57:42 AM
Narrative Causality: Things happen because the plot says they should.

that's what it all boils down to.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Amber Williams on April 19, 2010, 11:00:55 AM
I realize some people have a very "nails to chalkboard" reaction to the concept that magic is the answer to a situation.  I suppose it's been slowly ingrained that "a wizard did it" is just an excuse for laziness.

But magic IS an integral part of the DMFA world.  It isn't just a minor element in the storyline, it is an essential part of the comic.  And it does influence a lot of the elements in the world as it acts as a randomizer and allows for the bending of rules when in a normal world the majority of things happening wouldn't happen.  

While I'm sure with a lot of time and flowcharts and graphs and math, I could try to half-ass some logical reasoning behind why this does that and whatnot...it defeats the point of everything and it would strangle the comic I feel.  
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 19, 2010, 11:05:45 AM
Quote from: Amber Williams on April 19, 2010, 11:00:55 AM
While I'm sure with a lot of time and flowcharts and graphs and math, I could try to half-ass some logical reasoning behind why this does that and whatnot...it defeats the point of everything and it would strangle the comic I feel.  

i'm fairly certain that with the majority of your readerbase, puppets would suffice.  :U
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Jasae Bushae on April 19, 2010, 01:53:03 PM
puppets make everything better ^^
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Anker Steadfast on April 19, 2010, 02:31:31 PM
Puppets .. and Mows.

:mowmeep
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Scow2 on April 19, 2010, 04:52:53 PM
Well... for those who really want to debate and analyze the way things work... we can put Functional Magic into the equation... Magic can do anything, just like computers. The fun part is arguing and analyzing what magical processes are required to seamlessly merge the offspring of species that are genetically compatible but physically vastly different.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Michael Chandra on April 19, 2010, 05:14:18 PM
Quote from: Scow2 on April 19, 2010, 04:52:53 PMMagic can do anything, just like computers.
So then you are hypothesizing that Mab is Turing-Complete? :mowcookie
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Anker Steadfast on April 19, 2010, 05:23:02 PM
More like the turing test blew up when she offered it cookies. :D
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 19, 2010, 05:27:58 PM
I like how a reason is given and then people try to reshape that reason into something that suits their idea better.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 19, 2010, 08:22:57 PM
This was only a debate for a real possible Taurs, ...

Over use of Magic will lead to chaos, poor character and a weak story... but Amber is very good to not to overload the story with "It is magic"... But the little details not related to plot do not need to be over-thoughtout either.  

Now, Goddess Amber said "Oh that's cute, make it so" and it was so... And it was good.

PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 20, 2010, 08:23:54 AM
I know I said this in another thread already but:  Threads like this are why the forum can't have nice things.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 20, 2010, 08:27:38 AM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 20, 2010, 08:23:54 AM
I know I said this in another thread already but:  Threads like this are why the forum can't have nice things.

unfortunately folks who make threads like this is like having a cat who's just had milk...


it's just horrible to see the aftermath.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Anker Steadfast on April 20, 2010, 12:31:18 PM
Well ... what happens then, if you cross these two ?

(http://naut6g.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pg2f4m5BtJEfQDHlkJmNg3QlY2UivLAjPM7ZgALBc5LaxfEOZU3BjwWXNQ9BCuSztKwjFKrZ0rYImHofpBsWv3mUsvqT3UN7q/tinfoilhat2cy2_small.jpg)
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 20, 2010, 12:33:19 PM
You get a shaved cat.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Arcblade on April 20, 2010, 04:53:40 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 19, 2010, 05:27:58 PM
I like how a reason is given and then people try to reshape that reason into something that suits their idea better.

"If you give a mouse a cookie..." 
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Anker Steadfast on April 20, 2010, 10:07:32 PM
Quote from: Arcblade on April 20, 2010, 04:53:40 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 19, 2010, 05:27:58 PMI like how a reason is given and then people try to reshape that reason into something that suits their idea better.
"If you give a mouse a cookie..." 

Would this be cookies made by Mab (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_210.php), or .. ?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 21, 2010, 05:10:16 AM
... brownies made by Mab?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 21, 2010, 11:37:40 AM
Quote from: Arcblade on April 20, 2010, 04:53:40 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 19, 2010, 05:27:58 PM
I like how a reason is given and then people try to reshape that reason into something that suits their idea better.

"If you give a mouse a cookie..."

A cookie?!!    :mowcookie

Some one said something about a catgirls dying over this .... It's self-defense     Now,  I am not sure I should be ashamed, shocked, or honored that I cause a whole new folder for the weird and the strange things created by the collective madness that is DMFA forum....

*takes a Mab's cookie*  PBH
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Suwako on April 21, 2010, 11:47:54 AM
Truthfully, I would have expected it to end in the mine, but whatever. It seems that it is deemed informative enough to be rewarded it's own musky corner. Oh dear. What will end here next? A cubi genetics conversation? a Fea evolution theory? A dragon for president thread? Let's find out in a new episode of Tinfoil Hat Tearooms. Exclusively on Clockworkmansionforums, not for sale, all rights reserved.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 21, 2010, 11:52:05 AM
Oh, I wouldn't be quite proud of being sent here, my friends.  In fact, you should be concerned.  You see, this is a place much akin to the Hatter's tea party.  You're more far gone than you realize if you've found yourself here.

But don't fret!  Now's your chance.  Repent your ways, and you'll escape with only one lump, instead of two.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 21, 2010, 02:07:35 PM
I should really change it so posts in this section don't count towards member totals...

EDIT: Done.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 21, 2010, 02:14:02 PM
Oooh! Nice.  Thank ya'. :3
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 21, 2010, 04:12:09 PM
By the heavenly father and mother of us,

They've given the Mao the Mad Hatter the keys to this Loonyville....

And Mao I want my tea set back when you are done.

PBH 
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 21, 2010, 04:31:43 PM
Your tea set?

Whatever made you think we borrowed yours?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: ShadesFox on April 21, 2010, 04:41:36 PM
I was wondering where my tea set went.  You could ask instead of, you know, breaking into my house and killing the cat to get it.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 21, 2010, 07:08:27 PM
Don't forget the *ahem* teabags.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 21, 2010, 07:20:01 PM
I heard this story about two young ladies and a... oh.  I see.  I've just been informed that this joke is far too naughty for this place.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 21, 2010, 08:54:36 PM
You're the moderator. Set the rules.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Arcblade on April 21, 2010, 09:27:31 PM
Heh.  Congrats, Mao.  You got made a moderator after all.  Now people won't be wrong when they automatically think you're a mod. 

That said, I'm now going to flee this place before it infects my brain.   :mowtongue
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 21, 2010, 09:32:01 PM
Quote from: Darkmoon Firelyte on April 21, 2010, 08:54:36 PM
You're the moderator. Set the rules.

I was on my way to do that actually. :3

Quote from: Arcblade on April 21, 2010, 09:27:31 PM
Heh.  Congrats, Mao.  You got made a moderator after all.  Now people won't be wrong when they automatically think you're a mod. 

That said, I'm now going to flee this place before it infects my brain.   :mowtongue

Only in this tiny little tearoom.  Elsewhere I'm still the same Mao that you've all come to know.  As for the fleeing?  Good idea.  I think that, in time, this place is going to get a bit hard on the head.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: bradypodidae on April 21, 2010, 10:07:10 PM
Wait... what? Me? No no no no, you've got it all wrong! I just took a wrong turn at Albuquerque, honest!

But since I now know this place exists and whose in charge, I'll just sit over here quietly...  :popcorn
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 21, 2010, 10:16:19 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 21, 2010, 09:32:01 PM
Quote from: Darkmoon Firelyte on April 21, 2010, 08:54:36 PM
You're the moderator. Set the rules.

I was on my way to do that actually. :3

Quote from: Arcblade on April 21, 2010, 09:27:31 PM
Heh.  Congrats, Mao.  You got made a moderator after all.  Now people won't be wrong when they automatically think you're a mod. 

That said, I'm now going to flee this place before it infects my brain.   :mowtongue

Only in this tiny little tearoom.  Elsewhere I'm still the same Mao that you've all come to know.  As for the fleeing?  Good idea.  I think that, in time, this place is going to get a bit hard on the head.

so we'll need the heavy duty mining equipment? GLEE!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Tapewolf on April 22, 2010, 03:35:42 AM
Quote from: Prof B Hunnydew on April 21, 2010, 04:12:09 PM
By the heavenly father and mother of us,
They've given the Mao the Mad Hatter the keys to this Loonyville....

Actually, what springs to mind (*) for me is a little bit of dialogue from Labyrinth which went something like this:

"...and if she kisses you, I'll make you a prince."
"A prince...?"
"The prince of the Bog of Eternal Stench."



EDIT: (*)  Earlier this read 'mine'.  Freudian slip there, I guess.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Sofox on April 22, 2010, 05:05:10 AM
This is kinda a fun forum.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mrs_A_ZeTavia on April 22, 2010, 05:43:11 AM
A tea party in the forums, how delightful!  :3 I brought scones and biscuts for everybody.  :bun







Oh, and btw congrats Mao! :mowhappy
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 22, 2010, 06:11:51 AM
Might I have a biscuit instead of a biscut?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 22, 2010, 06:49:32 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 22, 2010, 06:11:51 AM
Might I have a biscuit instead of a biscut?

Bikkies!  >:3
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Prof B Hunnydew on April 22, 2010, 10:39:08 AM
I was trying to be kind.... I have been to that Bog...well, the cliff overlook.  It is not pretty...

Well, Luck good, Mao  May wisdom and merryment surround you.

Ah "good night everybody"

:ipod
PBH

And chill it down with fire....
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Sunblink on April 22, 2010, 11:17:29 AM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 21, 2010, 09:32:01 PM
Only in this tiny little tearoom.  Elsewhere I'm still the same Mao that you've all come to know.  As for the fleeing?  Good idea.  I think that, in time, this place is going to get a bit hard on the head.

Oh, so does that mean you're a mini-moderator?


Or should I say

A DEMI-MOD harharhar.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 22, 2010, 12:15:24 PM
Nah. Mao is more of a hemisemidemimod.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 22, 2010, 12:35:26 PM
God.. that sounds like a Digimon name.  Go!  Weregarurudramadenimao!

...mon.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Turnsky on April 22, 2010, 12:42:08 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on April 22, 2010, 12:35:26 PM
God.. that sounds like a Digimon name.  Go!  Weregarurudramadenimao!

...mon.

or Jamaican

'ey mon  :3
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Sunblink on April 22, 2010, 12:44:36 PM
Digimon was the coolest thing ever.

Demimaomon. I propose that this old thing I drew (http://clockworkmansion.com/forum/index.php/topic,7001.msg315438.html#msg315438) be your in-training form, y/y? :>

Seriously, it's not all that different from the usual in-training fare. (http://digimon.wikia.com/wiki/File:Tokomon_b.jpg)
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 22, 2010, 01:07:56 PM
Digivolve into Champion!  Digivolve into Ultimate!

Weredemimaomon!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 22, 2010, 04:07:38 PM
Bad! No! No cookie!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 22, 2010, 04:24:09 PM
...you're going to give me a BLT, aren't you?  :<
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on April 22, 2010, 08:35:50 PM
You'd like that, though.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 22, 2010, 11:48:18 PM
Not the way I give it.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 26, 2010, 01:43:34 PM
It's a BLT suppository, isn't it?
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 26, 2010, 04:07:25 PM
All the nutritiousness, now without crumbs in your lap.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 26, 2010, 04:09:47 PM
It's like the classic bacon suppository... only better!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 26, 2010, 04:10:37 PM
I find a little bit of butter helps to get it...

No, you know what -- too far for this forum.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 26, 2010, 04:11:51 PM
Indeed.  I think we just skirted the line on this one.

HA!  Even as I posted it I thought of ways I could twist that!
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Darkmoon on April 26, 2010, 04:12:44 PM
This thread got locked again?

Eh, it's for the best, really.
Title: Re: A question that might have been answered? @_@
Post by: Mao on April 26, 2010, 04:14:02 PM
Wasn't me.  I blame you.