The Clockwork Mansion

Underground Warehouse => Abandoned Mine => Topic started by: Keklily on March 23, 2010, 07:31:31 AM

Title: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Keklily on March 23, 2010, 07:31:31 AM
I just came up with a weird thought and I never saw any other thread with this! (correct me if wrong, ish suck at searching).....

Matilda is a taur added with Dans feline genes and make the child a hir (Herm) and we got a blue furred Chakat. And since all in Cyra clan is green eyed it's perfect. Dan and Matilda's child makes a good natural chakat!

cheers Chakat Keklily.....  :mowcookie
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Turnsky on March 23, 2010, 07:47:57 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v625/Turnsky/random%20shite/worffrustration.gif)
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 23, 2010, 07:52:06 AM
Hiya, Keklily. The Lost Lake is PG-rated. Chakats are not. Nuff said.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Psaakyrn on March 23, 2010, 07:53:16 AM
http://missmab.com/Demo/HG02.php
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Keklily on March 23, 2010, 08:03:56 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 23, 2010, 07:52:06 AM
Hiya, Keklily. The Lost Lake is PG-rated. Chakats are not. Nuff said.

you can make them PG. And I was thinking! their customs may be naugthy but Amber made the most naughty pg why couldn't she make one chakat!

cheers Chakat Keklily
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Turnsky on March 23, 2010, 09:32:11 AM
Quote from: Keklily on March 23, 2010, 08:03:56 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 23, 2010, 07:52:06 AM
Hiya, Keklily. The Lost Lake is PG-rated. Chakats are not. Nuff said.

you can make them PG. And I was thinking! their customs may be naugthy but Amber made the most naughty pg why couldn't she make one chakat!

cheers Chakat Keklily


uuuh.... no.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 23, 2010, 09:34:08 AM
Quote from: Keklily on March 23, 2010, 08:03:56 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 23, 2010, 07:52:06 AM
Hiya, Keklily. The Lost Lake is PG-rated. Chakats are not. Nuff said.

you can make them PG.

Yes. You can. If you really try. You haven't, you're merely bringing them up. Hence, not PG. Hence, not allowed in Lost Lake.

Thank you for playing, have a nice day.


Would you care to argue the point further?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 23, 2010, 11:23:50 AM
I dare her to.

FYI, props, Turnsky, on the beautiful facepalm.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Mao on March 23, 2010, 11:53:51 AM
*coughs*Him*coughs*

And yes, the Worf facepalm is quite epic.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 24, 2010, 03:05:04 PM
Quote from: Mao Laoren on March 23, 2010, 11:53:51 AM
*coughs*Him*coughs*

Yes, him too. I dare them both.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Mao on March 24, 2010, 03:18:43 PM
....but do you double dog dare them?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 24, 2010, 07:51:01 PM
I'm allergic to dogs.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: ShadesFox on March 24, 2010, 08:34:35 PM
Genetically modified hypoallergenic dog dare?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 25, 2010, 04:44:46 PM
That does kinda roll off the tongue...
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Mao on March 25, 2010, 08:00:42 PM
It's smooth.  Smooth like butter.  Real butter.  Not that margarine crap.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Turnsky on March 26, 2010, 12:11:01 AM
is it polyunsaturated and partially hydrogenated?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 26, 2010, 12:24:42 AM
It's polysyllabic and mono-Slavic.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Anker Steadfast on March 26, 2010, 08:20:04 AM
 :erk

If the Abandoned Mine is where the posts that are too silly to live in the other forums, goes.
Then where do posts that are too silly for the Abandoned Mine go ?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Mao on March 26, 2010, 09:10:04 AM
No such thing.  The mine is the be all and end all of the stupidity of CMF.  All things too stupid for the mods to stomach end up here to be mocked.  It is the final resting place for bad threads.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Amber Williams on March 26, 2010, 03:54:09 PM
To this day and age I am still not sure what exactly a chakat is.  From my base knowledge of the internet is a hermaphrodite cat-taur?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 26, 2010, 04:59:55 PM
herm taur, basically, yes. As written by someone who doesn't get laid enough.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: ShadesFox on March 26, 2010, 06:30:38 PM
Quote from: Amber Williams on March 26, 2010, 03:54:09 PM
To this day and age I am still not sure what exactly a chakat is.  From my base knowledge of the internet is a hermaphrodite cat-taur?
I just left it up to context and never asked many questions on the subject.
Unless you want to look it up.
Come on.  I Genetically modified hypoallergenic dog dare you!
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 26, 2010, 10:36:55 PM
To answer the question:

If a question is too bad for the Mine, I just delete them.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Anker Steadfast on March 27, 2010, 05:54:54 AM
ooOoo ... that happen often ?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Turnsky on March 27, 2010, 06:01:26 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 26, 2010, 04:59:55 PM
herm taur, basically, yes.

pretty much, yeah... truth be told i never really understood the point of herms. (outside of the obvious of course)

i find the terminology folks use such as "Hir" to be extremely irritating.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Techcubi on March 27, 2010, 10:21:28 AM
Quote from: Turnsky on March 27, 2010, 06:01:26 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 26, 2010, 04:59:55 PM
herm taur, basically, yes.

pretty much, yeah... truth be told i never really understood the point of herms. (outside of the obvious of course)

i find the terminology folks use such as "Hir" to be extremely irritating.

Other than the fact that most of them don't require a partner to reproduce...?
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Turnsky on March 27, 2010, 10:30:38 AM
Quote from: Techcubi on March 27, 2010, 10:21:28 AM
Quote from: Turnsky on March 27, 2010, 06:01:26 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 26, 2010, 04:59:55 PM
herm taur, basically, yes.

pretty much, yeah... truth be told i never really understood the point of herms. (outside of the obvious of course)

i find the terminology folks use such as "Hir" to be extremely irritating.

Other than the fact that most of them don't require a partner to reproduce...?

again, not seeing a whole lot of point.
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Amber Williams on March 27, 2010, 03:12:11 PM
Looking about, I think the main reason I am probably meh to the idea of hermaphrodite characters is I find their character development stunted.  When you have a race or an individual who's main appeal or focus is their genitals, it tends to put them in a rather closed perspective.    I remember talking to a friend about the possibility of making a character a herm but never actually making any reference to the fact and the person responded with "well what is the point then?"

The issue I find with herms is that in a lot of characters, they are their character feature first and personality second.  To a lesser extent I find it the same problem that sometimes happens when you bring a gay character into play.  They don't really exist as a character all of their own, with their own personal quirks and feelings and aspirations...they are TEH GAY CHARACTAAARGH.  And in that sense, a chakat would always be a chakat first and foremost and "that chakat character" rather than the individual.  And having a character be defined by such a single feature is often a hamper to the character since they either have to work extra hard to be a character despite their feature, or they have to embrace their feature and fall into the pitfall of "yeah. I got both sets of danglies."
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Anker Steadfast on March 27, 2010, 11:29:56 PM
Yeah, I reckon making a good character around that would be complicated ... though I think a Jellyfish might be harder still.

They start out life as larva, which then goes into a form of chrysalis where they become a sort of plant/coral, which then splits itself into what is kinda like a stack of pancakes, where each pancake is essentially a non-gendrered jellyfish! Then they float around in order to mature .. some of them become males, other becomes females and their "danglies" are at their mouths .. of which they have four. As well as four "brains", four central nervous systems, and if damaged, they can sometimes split into 4 separate jellyfish ! All of which can lay egg, that can turn into larvae, thus restarting the process. Also, they don't breathe, they don't go to the toilet, doesn't have a heart, heck doesn't even have blood vessels or even blood!

Yeah, we humans can come up with some odd creatures, but we have nothing on nature.

Nature is just weird!

:D
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Darkmoon on March 28, 2010, 10:03:31 AM
Quote from: Anker Steadfast on March 27, 2010, 05:54:54 AM
ooOoo ... that happen often ?

Not that leaves any proof it ever existed at all, no. ;)

EDIT: And damn it now I want into intro a jellyfish character into CVRPG...
Title: Re: Dan and Matilda's love child theory!
Post by: Anker Steadfast on March 28, 2010, 05:36:14 PM
Heh, there are some egglayer species that will fertilise their eggs, even if there isn't a male around to fertilise said eggs.
And then, the chicken that comes out of the egg will often be a male chicken.
I think Turkeys can do it too.

And there were some salamanders as well, that could change gender upon maturing, if they had the need for it.

I repeat, Nature is weird ! :D