The Clockwork Mansion

Village Square => The Lost Lake Inn => Topic started by: Jack McSlay on November 11, 2008, 06:25:49 PM

Title: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Jack McSlay on November 11, 2008, 06:25:49 PM
I was thinking, do the patches use glue? as anyone probably knows, glue and fur are a BAD mix...
unless there's some effective solvent or the glue loosens after some time.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Mao on November 11, 2008, 06:28:21 PM
You mean the ones that Jyrras made?  It's quite likely they use static cling to work.  For example, if you rub a balloon on your hair the static electricity can make it stick there.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 11, 2008, 06:28:49 PM
... how about magic?

Magic sounds good. Since the whole idea of the patches is that they use, well, magic...
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Mao on November 11, 2008, 06:31:35 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 11, 2008, 06:28:49 PM
... how about magic?

Magic sounds good. Since the whole idea of the patches is that they use, well, magic...

I thought the things that Jyrras made were completely untouched by magic. :S
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ren Gaulen on November 11, 2008, 06:32:53 PM
Quote from: Mowser on November 11, 2008, 06:31:35 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 11, 2008, 06:28:49 PM
... how about magic?

Magic sounds good. Since the whole idea of the patches is that they use, well, magic...
I though the things that Jyrras made were completely untouched by magic. :S
I remember him mentioning that Mab helped him with the patches, though.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 06:45:49 PM
A combination of magic and science. (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_261.php)
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ren Gaulen on November 11, 2008, 06:55:04 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 06:45:49 PM
A combination of magic and science. (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_261.php)
I can't resist.. WHAT HAVE MAGIC AND SCIENCE DONE?!! D: ..Sorry.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Mao on November 11, 2008, 06:58:23 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 06:45:49 PM
A combination of magic and science. (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_261.php)

Oooh, thanks.  Completely forgot that.

Quote from: Ren Gaulen on November 11, 2008, 06:55:04 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 06:45:49 PM
A combination of magic and science. (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_261.php)
I can't resist.. WHAT HAVE MAGIC AND SCIENCE DONE?!! D: ..Sorry.

Y'know.. for someone who follows the God Emperor of the Imperium I find it strangely heretical for you not to have complete and unwavering faith in both science and magic.  The God Emperor was a man of science before the events that led to his slumber and you follow a living god.  Sounds like a bit of magic to me.

...

Heretic.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 07:07:37 PM
Quote from: Ren Gaulen on November 11, 2008, 06:55:04 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 06:45:49 PM
A combination of magic and science. (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_261.php)
I can't resist.. WHAT HAVE MAGIC AND SCIENCE DONE?!! D: ..Sorry.

THE ADEPTUS MECHANICUS ARE NOT PLEASED. >:[

Quote from: Mowser on November 11, 2008, 06:58:23 PM
Y'know.. for someone who follows the God Emperor of the Imperium I find it strangely heretical for you not to have complete and unwavering faith in both science and magic.  The God Emperor was a man of science before the events that led to his slumber and you follow a living god.  Sounds like a bit of magic to me.

...

Heretic.

On the other hand, you're questioning and talking back to an Imperial Commissar. Sounds like heresy to me... >:]
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Mao on November 11, 2008, 07:16:31 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 07:07:37 PM
Quote from: Mowser on November 11, 2008, 06:58:23 PM
Y'know.. for someone who follows the God Emperor of the Imperium I find it strangely heretical for you not to have complete and unwavering faith in both science and magic.  The God Emperor was a man of science before the events that led to his slumber and you follow a living god.  Sounds like a bit of magic to me.

...

Heretic.

On the other hand, you're questioning and talking back to an Imperial Commissar. Sounds like heresy to me... >:]

We already know I'm a heretic.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 11, 2008, 07:21:44 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 07:07:37 PM
On the other hand, you're questioning and talking back to an Imperial Commissar. Sounds like heresy to me... >:]

Yes, but we all know Mowser is doing it for the greater good.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: e_voyager on November 11, 2008, 09:14:04 PM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 07:07:37 PM


THE ADEPTUS MECHANICUS ARE NOT PLEASED. >:[

Quote from: Mowser on November 11, 2008, 06:58:23 PM
Y'know.. for someone who follows the God Emperor of the Imperium I find it strangely heretical for you not to have complete and unwavering faith in both science and magic.  The God Emperor was a man of science before the events that led to his slumber and you follow a living god.  Sounds like a bit of magic to me.

...

Heretic.

On the other hand, you're questioning and talking back to an Imperial Commissar. Sounds like heresy to me... >:]

have you ever read the second part of the blue adept series?
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: AmigaDragon on November 11, 2008, 10:05:42 PM
What point separates the first and second parts of the series? I believe I've read through the 3rd book but I'm looking for the 4th before reading the 5th (or wherever my gap is).
Quote from: Jack McSlay on November 11, 2008, 06:25:49 PM
I was thinking, do the patches use glue? as anyone probably knows, glue and fur are a BAD mix...
unless there's some effective solvent or the glue loosens after some time.
In the case of Dan's bracer patch, an adhesive was unnecessary.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Chaos on November 12, 2008, 02:51:00 AM
Quote from: Cogidubnus on November 11, 2008, 07:07:37 PM


THE ADEPTUS MECHANICUS ARE NOT PLEASED. >:[

Quote from: Mowser on November 11, 2008, 06:58:23 PM
Y'know.. for someone who follows the God Emperor of the Imperium I find it strangely heretical for you not to have complete and unwavering faith in both science and magic.  The God Emperor was a man of science before the events that led to his slumber and you follow a living god.  Sounds like a bit of magic to me.

...

Heretic.

On the other hand, you're questioning and talking back to an Imperial Commissar. Sounds like heresy to me... >:]

I should stay out of this... it bound to end badly.  :<
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 03:05:02 AM
Quote from: e_voyager on November 11, 2008, 09:14:04 PM
have you ever read the second part of the blue adept series?

IIRC, he started to lose the plot about midway through, and ended up just barfing random junk onto the page and hoping it would sell, based purely on his name on the cover.

Mind you, that's my explanation for the Xanth series degradation, as well, so...
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Eagle0600 on November 12, 2008, 06:07:32 AM
Then again, your machine god is a C'Tan, if I remember correctly.

*Dives for cover*
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 06:15:44 AM
No, I believe you're thinking of someone else. I'm atheist.

Or possibly agnostic, but only very infrequently. Or when I look at my wife, naked, and think "There must be a god!" ...
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Lego3400 on November 12, 2008, 11:32:42 AM
Patches aren't always in the form of a "Patch" Azlan has one in the form of a strip of cloth he uses as a bandanda. Dan had one that was in the form of a bracer.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ghostwish on November 12, 2008, 08:35:54 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 06:15:44 AM
Or when I look at my wife, naked, and think "There must be a god!" ...

Pics!
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 13, 2008, 03:11:53 AM
Quote from: Ghostwish on November 12, 2008, 08:35:54 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 06:15:44 AM
Or when I look at my wife, naked, and think "There must be a god!" ...
Pics!

Oh, yes, I have. And you don't. And won't.

nyahnyahnyah!

;-]
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ghostwish on November 13, 2008, 02:42:26 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 13, 2008, 03:11:53 AM
Quote from: Ghostwish on November 12, 2008, 08:35:54 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 06:15:44 AM
Or when I look at my wife, naked, and think "There must be a god!" ...
Pics!

Oh, yes, I have. And you don't. And won't.

nyahnyahnyah!

;-]

Evil.  :<
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: e_voyager on November 15, 2008, 02:07:47 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 03:05:02 AM

IIRC, he started to lose the plot about midway through, and ended up just barfing random junk onto the page and hoping it would sell, based purely on his name on the cover.

Mind you, that's my explanation for the Xanth series degradation, as well, so...

yes unicorn point was most disappointing. and i stopped reading xanth books a little after yon ill wind. but i was thing of the robot adept bane i i think his name was or maybe mok. i forget it's been a while mind you.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Naldru on November 15, 2008, 11:40:10 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 12, 2008, 03:05:02 AM
Quote from: e_voyager on November 11, 2008, 09:14:04 PM
have you ever read the second part of the blue adept series?

IIRC, he started to lose the plot about midway through, and ended up just barfing random junk onto the page and hoping it would sell, based purely on his name on the cover.

Mind you, that's my explanation for the Xanth series degradation, as well, so...
I believe that those are excellent examples of "Jumping the Shark" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark).  (It has its own TV Tropes section (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JumpingTheShark).)    Although the term was originally coined for television shows (http://www.jumpingtheshark.com), the same concept seems to apply to many book series as well.

However, my personal opinion is that Rowlings and Pratchett have never, and will never, jump the shark.  (I also feel that Baum never jumped the shark, although I don't know if I can say the same about later authors of the Oz series.)
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 15, 2008, 02:24:37 PM
Rowlings...

... not jumped the shark?


Er...

Are you reading the same books I've been reading?
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Naldru on November 15, 2008, 02:38:14 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 15, 2008, 02:24:37 PM
Rowlings...

... not jumped the shark?


Er...

Are you reading the same books I've been reading?
When you can get pre-teens to read a six to eight hundred page book without wanting to take breaks, I'd say that you are still entertaining the readers.  On the other hand, I think she has brought the series to a point where she can't add additional books without jumping the shark.  I will admit that the tone has changed considerably and become much darker.

Will you agree about Pratchett, though?
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 15, 2008, 02:41:48 PM
... being able to get the teens to read the book is one thing. You don't necessarily get to avoid jumping the shark at the same time.

Many pre-teens have no taste. This is not surprising, since many adults have no taste, either.


As for Pratchett, he hasn't, in my opinion, jumped the shark yet. I'd be disappointed if he did, but the possibility remains that he will.

After all, he's got Altzheimers, you know...
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: e_voyager on November 15, 2008, 05:29:08 PM
time oh of the few concepts that now one may out run. not even a voyager
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: GabrielsThoughts on November 15, 2008, 06:32:29 PM
I never really put much thought into Jyrras patches, but they obviously wear off. Maybe they don't wear off and just dissolve when the magic is used up, but that wouldn't really explain how easily the cubi patch fell off Jy at SAIA. f the patches were a medically feasible Perhaps the paper is coated in nanites that rewrite DNA on a genetic level Since all  Humans have 99.9% of the same genes (not to be confused with DNA) and since there are a number of species that can Halfbreed one could assume that the genes for the demon, angel, mythos, etc. are all probably shared by most of the beings in Furrae

If the patches were purely Magic paper, and the appearance was a simple illusion why then dose the paper still exist if separated from the host?

either way I'm thinking the paper has an undisclosed  time limit.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: e_voyager on November 15, 2008, 06:50:29 PM
Jy's patch became a jacket when he went cubi. when he fainted and fell out of the jacket that able was still holding then the patch reverted to normal.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Jairus on November 15, 2008, 07:36:36 PM
Well, I've always felt that since the patches are a combo of magic and science, they're basically a computer chip-controlled/programmed shapeshifting spell which allows for superior control over the spell. Or it could just be that he's somehow "captured" a spell through his understanding of technology and science. I mean, that's how SCINs work in my setting which basically achieve the same result, but Amber's Patches may be a lot different for all I know. Sorry if it's a bit tangental.

And the thing I've heard about the darkening tone of the Harry Potter books is that each book is meant to be read by kid's of HARRY's age in the books. The first one may be written for eleven year olds, but the seventh one is written for an eighteen-year old. At least, that's what I've heard.

As for Pratchet jumping the shark... I'd be sad, but the fact that the man has written so much means that I'd forgive him somewhat. That could just be the Pratchet fanboy in me.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Jer-oh-me on November 15, 2008, 08:21:46 PM
I like to think of the patches sort of working like those Listerine tongue strips and simply dissolve into the user's skin when applied, as that seems to be what happens to them.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Jairus on November 15, 2008, 08:33:27 PM
Quote from: Jer-oh-me on November 15, 2008, 08:21:46 PM
I like to think of the patches sort of working like those Listerine tongue strips and simply dissolve into the user's skin when applied, as that seems to be what happens to them.
Or that model just hides itself by using the same shapeshifting/illusion magic that's altering the user. It'd make sense. Which just raises how to find it once it's hiding... I mean, it'd be in basically the same place, but still.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: techmaster-glitch on November 15, 2008, 08:35:40 PM
Quote from: Jer-oh-me on November 15, 2008, 08:21:46 PM
I like to think of the patches sort of working like those Listerine tongue strips and simply dissolve into the user's skin when applied, as that seems to be what happens to them.
"I managed to get it off..." (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_245.php)
"You were supposed to take it off hours ago!" (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_264.php)
And then in this (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_241.php) one, I think that's the patch on Lorenda's nose

But these are the general "beta-patches". The custom ones work differently...
Bandanna-Patch (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_240.php)
Bracer-Patch (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_311.php)
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: GabrielsThoughts on November 15, 2008, 11:15:51 PM
OMG! I just realized patch could also mean as in a game patch, as  when something is hex edited or manipulated to make something better. This could  imply that Furrae exists as some kind of digital world parallel to our own controlled by a god of some kind... wait. 
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: superluser on November 15, 2008, 11:39:27 PM
Quote from: GabrielsThoughts on November 15, 2008, 11:15:51 PMOMG! I just realized patch could also mean as in a game patch, as  when something is hex edited or manipulated to make something better. This could  imply that Furrae exists as some kind of digital world parallel to our own controlled by a god of some kind... wait.

I always assumed that that was the joke.  Since Furcadia allowed for use of patches, which would work in a very similar manner to what Jyrras was doing, I assumed that this was a carry over concept.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Nikki on November 17, 2008, 02:17:16 AM
Quote from: techmaster-glitch on November 15, 2008, 08:35:40 PM
And then in this (http://www.missmab.com/Comics/Vol_241.php) one, I think that's the patch on Lorenda's nose

Nope, that's her nose-stripe =3
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: GabrielsThoughts on November 29, 2008, 09:43:41 PM
OMG! it's so obvious.  STATIC! the paper patches are held to fur via static electricity. And, it's the most obvious solution.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ghostwish on November 30, 2008, 12:39:07 AM
SO close to threadomancy. SO close.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: superluser on November 30, 2008, 12:49:12 AM
Quote from: Ghostwish on November 30, 2008, 12:39:07 AMSO close to threadomancy. SO close.

I do believe threadomancy would be thread magic.  Or rubbing away magic, judging from the etymology.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 30, 2008, 06:07:49 AM
Quote from: Ghostwish on November 30, 2008, 12:39:07 AM
SO close to threadomancy. SO close.

So close to breaching rule 10. If only you'd said "threadcromancy"... ;-]
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: Ghostwish on November 30, 2008, 10:02:24 AM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on November 30, 2008, 06:07:49 AM
Quote from: Ghostwish on November 30, 2008, 12:39:07 AM
SO close to threadomancy. SO close.

So close to breaching rule 10. If only you'd said "threadcromancy"... ;-]

"I'm dancing on a line tonight, oh yessssss.."

Now if only I had the suit to match. Le sigh.
Title: Re: Patches + Fur = ?
Post by: e_voyager on November 30, 2008, 12:12:07 PM
now now. even fools learn not to tease fate lest it smack them hard. either way it's off to finale crisis for me.