The Clockwork Mansion

The Grand Hallway => The Outer Fortress => Topic started by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:23:18 PM

Poll
Question: Who would win, Batman or Captain America?
Option 1: Captain America
Option 2: Batman
Option 3: Tie
Title: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:23:18 PM
Okay, my question is this, who would win in a battle, Batman  :batman or Captain America? There has been much debate among comic geeks about this for years. If you are going to post here please don't just say which you think is better, think logically and don't use "Captain America is dead" as a reason for Batman  :batman winning. I'm talking about when he was alive.

Now, my personal opinion is that the winner would be Captain America for a few simple reasons.
1. Captain America is one of the original superheroes, he has been around longer than Batman and has much more experience in combat.
2. The Super Soldier Serum, it made Captain America strong and fast as possible, but not to the point where he was superhuman as well as giving him almost perfect reaction time.
3. Captain America has beaten almost every superhero and villain in the Marvel universe, but how many people has Batman  :batman beaten?
4. Besides all these other points he has been in many large scale battles without actually killing anyone showing superiority. The biggest example being World War II.

Now on the flip side Batman  :batman also has several of his own advantages. To show that I am thinking logically like I requested I will show the other side of things.
1. Batman's  :batman wide array of tools as opposed to Captain America just having his (indestructible) shield.
2. Batman  :batman has stealth on his side so he can also use the element of surprise effectively due to his ninja training.  :mowninja
3. Batman  :batman, apart from being very physically fit, is a super genius and a master of strategy.

But, I want to here everybody else's opinions. Go ahead and post what you think. I may be easily swayed to the other side of the argument depending on how well your arguments are.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Darkmoon on December 26, 2007, 09:42:32 PM
Always Batman, no matter what.

Batman beats Superman.
Batman beats Spiderman
Batman beats The US Army.
Batman beats Chuck Norris.

Always Batman.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: superluser on December 26, 2007, 09:46:02 PM
Quote from: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:23:18 PMNow, my personal opinion is that the winner would be Captain America for a few simple reasons.
1. Captain America is one of the original superheroes, he has been around longer than Batman and has much more experience in combat.
2. The Super Soldier Serum, it made Captain America strong and fast as possible, but not to the point where he was superhuman as well as giving him almost perfect reaction time.
3. Captain America has beaten almost every superhero and villain in the Marvel universe, but how many people has Batman  :batman beaten?
4. Besides all these other points he has been in many large scale battles without actually killing anyone showing superiority. The biggest example being World War II.

Batman defeated Superman.

Those four points refer to Superman as well as Captain America, so Batman could easily defeat Captain America.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:48:32 PM
Quote from: superluser on December 26, 2007, 09:46:02 PM
Quote from: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:23:18 PMNow, my personal opinion is that the winner would be Captain America for a few simple reasons.
1. Captain America is one of the original superheroes, he has been around longer than Batman and has much more experience in combat.
2. The Super Soldier Serum, it made Captain America strong and fast as possible, but not to the point where he was superhuman as well as giving him almost perfect reaction time.
3. Captain America has beaten almost every superhero and villain in the Marvel universe, but how many people has Batman  :batman beaten?
4. Besides all these other points he has been in many large scale battles without actually killing anyone showing superiority. The biggest example being World War II.

Batman defeated Superman.

Those four points refer to Superman as well as Captain America, so Batman could easily defeat Captain America.
No. Not all four of the points. You also have to remember that Superman holds back most of the time because of his immense strength. I'm not saying your point isn't good, it is, but I'm just presenting an argument.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: superluser on December 26, 2007, 09:58:27 PM
Quote from: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:48:32 PMNo. Not all four of the points. You also have to remember that Superman holds back most of the time because of his immense strength. I'm not saying your point isn't good, it is, but I'm just presenting an argument.

You don't help yourself by saying that the guy Batman killed was even stronger than your guy.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 10:00:06 PM
Quote from: superluser on December 26, 2007, 09:58:27 PM
Quote from: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 09:48:32 PMNo. Not all four of the points. You also have to remember that Superman holds back most of the time because of his immense strength. I'm not saying your point isn't good, it is, but I'm just presenting an argument.

You don't help yourself by saying that the guy Batman killed was even stronger than your guy.
Wait, Batman killed Superman? When was this? Why wasn't I informed? WTF?
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 26, 2007, 10:00:14 PM
the answer is The Flash
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Damaris on December 26, 2007, 10:01:00 PM
Besides, Batman cheats.  Of course this means he'll win.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 10:03:25 PM
Okay, I don't see very many convincing arguments (save for superluser's) and I would like people to be a little more logical in their responses as well as give a few points. It will make this a lot more interesting.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on December 26, 2007, 10:04:55 PM
Logic? Here?

You -must- be joking.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 10:08:17 PM
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on December 26, 2007, 10:04:55 PM
Logic? Here?

You -must- be joking.
Please?
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: superluser on December 26, 2007, 10:14:27 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 26, 2007, 10:00:14 PMthe answer is The Flash

Yup.  Thread over.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Alondro on December 26, 2007, 10:20:36 PM
To hell with logic! 

Goku beats everyone, cuz he's the uber-god-moder-of-all!   :P
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 26, 2007, 10:23:14 PM
Okay. I give up. I abandon this thread.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 26, 2007, 11:34:14 PM
RIP  :<
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Alondro on December 26, 2007, 11:37:24 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 26, 2007, 11:34:14 PM
RIP  :<

Post an irrelevant question, ya get an irrelevant answer.   :3
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: GabrielsThoughts on December 27, 2007, 02:33:37 AM
everyone knows John McClain could easily kick both their asses, although there is some debate as to whether or not Detective McClain IS a Captain America.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Zina on December 27, 2007, 03:42:22 AM
I think this thread needs more Batman smilies.
:batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman
Batman.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: LionHeart on December 27, 2007, 06:37:37 AM
Batman and Captain America did get into a fight once, during the big DC vs Marvel crossover event.

As I recall, they pretty much fought each other to a standstill - they were that evenly matched.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 27, 2007, 09:19:28 AM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 03:42:22 AM
I think this thread needs more Batman smilies.
:batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman
Batman.
no

flash
(http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/8675/emotflashfactti8.gif)
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 27, 2007, 11:19:05 AM
Quote from: LionHeart on December 27, 2007, 06:37:37 AM
Batman and Captain America did get into a fight once, during the big DC vs Marvel crossover event.

As I recall, they pretty much fought each other to a standstill - they were that evenly matched.
THANK YOU! Finally somebody who put down something that helps answer my question. I figured it would end up something like that in the end as they are both very similar and mostly even. Thank you for actually putting something reasonable here as everybody else just seems to be stupid about it.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Alondro on December 27, 2007, 11:43:00 AM
Cuz we are stupid!   Alot of us just can't realize how vitally important to life answers about hypothetical comic book character battles are.   :B
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 27, 2007, 11:59:43 AM
We aim to not help
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Zina on December 27, 2007, 01:42:35 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 03:42:22 AM
I think this thread needs more Batman smilies.
:batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman
Batman.

I had a dream last night I got banned for this post.
My dreams are amazing and you're all jealous.

Sonic the Hedgehog beats the Flash. Any day.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 27, 2007, 02:27:00 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 01:42:35 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 03:42:22 AM
I think this thread needs more Batman smilies.
:batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman
Batman.

I had a dream last night I got banned for this post.
My dreams are amazing and you're all jealous.

Sonic the Hedgehog beats the Flash. Any day.
furry bias
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 27, 2007, 02:27:57 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 01:42:35 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 03:42:22 AM
I think this thread needs more Batman smilies.
:batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman :batman
Batman.

I had a dream last night I got banned for this post.
My dreams are amazing and you're all jealous.

Sonic the Hedgehog beats the Flash. Any day.
Yes. Sonic the Hedgehog does beat the Flash. However that doesn't change the fact that almost none of this has to do with the topic.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Eibborn on December 27, 2007, 02:42:07 PM
GO AQUAMAN WOOOO
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 27, 2007, 05:20:24 PM
Quote from: Eibbor_N on December 27, 2007, 02:42:07 PM
GO AQUAMAN WOOOO
Aquaman sucks. What are his powers? He can breath underwater and talk to fish. Powers that are useless anywhere but underwater. If I were him I'd take a shotgun to my own head.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 27, 2007, 05:24:03 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Nonsense, Zina is a woman. (oh snap sexism jokes ya)
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: superluser on December 27, 2007, 06:37:25 PM
Quote from: Rakala on December 27, 2007, 05:20:24 PMAquaman sucks. What are his powers? He can breath underwater and talk to fish. Powers that are useless anywhere but underwater. If I were him I'd take a shotgun to my own head.

Or perhaps hang it up as a superhero and become the most kickass marine biologist ever?

Nah.  Shotgun through the head makes more sense.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Zina on December 27, 2007, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 27, 2007, 05:24:03 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Nonsense, Zina is a woman. (oh snap sexism jokes ya)
So is Bill. (OOOOOO questioning your manhood, what are you going to do NOW?)
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Feroluce on December 28, 2007, 01:54:37 AM
I would answer this more seriously, but I know nearly nothing about Captain A. Batman I know is sneaky, cunning, and will ruthlessly exploit any possible weakness to win. Like intelligent stratagists, he realises that winning is more important then how you win. Conseqently my money is on him, especially if one of Cap A's advantages lies in his sheild, which while being indestructable can be removed...

:batman

on another note, MODFIGHT!! glee!

:popcorn

Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Alondro on December 28, 2007, 10:29:37 AM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 27, 2007, 05:24:03 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Nonsense, Zina is a woman. (oh snap sexism jokes ya)
So is Bill. (OOOOOO questioning your manhood, what are you going to do NOW?)

He'll agree.   >:3
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: bill on December 28, 2007, 11:36:44 AM
Quote from: Alondro on December 28, 2007, 10:29:37 AM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 27, 2007, 05:24:03 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Nonsense, Zina is a woman. (oh snap sexism jokes ya)
So is Bill. (OOOOOO questioning your manhood, what are you going to do NOW?)

He'll agree.   >:3
mods please ban


oh wait

>:3
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Alondro on December 28, 2007, 04:18:14 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 28, 2007, 11:36:44 AM
Quote from: Alondro on December 28, 2007, 10:29:37 AM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 11:31:57 PM
Quote from: BillBuckner on December 27, 2007, 05:24:03 PM
Quote from: Zina on December 27, 2007, 05:08:32 PM
Zina could beat up Bill. >[
Nonsense, Zina is a woman. (oh snap sexism jokes ya)
So is Bill. (OOOOOO questioning your manhood, what are you going to do NOW?)

He'll agree.   >:3
mods please ban


oh wait

>:3

:<

Bill is a mean gal.   :P
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Reese Tora on December 28, 2007, 09:17:05 PM
wait, what?

IIRC, Captain america is physically superior to Batman (super soldier serum) and has the backing of the americal government.

Batman is a well trained man of human strength, with the backing of all of Bruce Wayne's assets.
(spoiler: Batman is Bruce Wayne!)

how are they competing, why are they competing, where are they competing, when in each of thier developmental timelines are they each from?
(I believe that Who is covered :P )

In a straight up, clean physical confrontation, Cap would be the clear victor, and Batman could trounce him at chess or in a debate.
(if they were both dropped naked in an arena, who would win? the fic writters.)

--edit--

Also, Zina has a black tail tip like Ookami, so she would use her godly drawing powers to give Bill a villenous moustache and goatee, making her the clear victor.
(also, slash cut to vemove his hair,a nd with it his power.)
(The brush you use in Ookami is clearly Amaterasu's tail)
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 28, 2007, 09:26:34 PM
Quote from: Reese Tora on December 28, 2007, 09:17:05 PM
wait, what?

IIRC, Captain america is physically superior to Batman (super soldier serum) and has the backing of the americal government.

Batman is a well trained man of human strength, with the backing of all of Bruce Wayne's assets.
(spoiler: Batman is Bruce Wayne!)

how are they competing, why are they competing, where are they competing, when in each of thier developmental timelines are they each from?
(I believe that Who is covered :P )

In a straight up, clean physical confrontation, Cap would be the clear victor, and Batman could trounce him at chess or in a debate.
(if they were both dropped naked in an arena, who would win? the fic writters.)
ACtually there is another factor. Does Batman know about the battle ahead of time or not? Because if he did he would make sure it was in a time and place of his advantage.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Eibborn on December 29, 2007, 11:54:38 AM
Naaaah time and location don't matter. He has everything he needs in his utility belt, anyway.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on December 29, 2007, 01:29:50 PM
Quote from: Eibbor_N on December 29, 2007, 11:54:38 AM
Naaaah time and location don't matter. He has everything he needs in his utility belt, anyway.
Hold on, Batman would have a clear advantage in a warehouse in the middle of the night.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: rabid_fox on December 30, 2007, 09:54:10 AM

Bill Gates would buy and sell both their sorry asses. Money is the only real superpower.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: LionHeart on December 30, 2007, 11:35:07 AM
Quote from: rabid_fox on December 30, 2007, 09:54:10 AM

Bill Gates would buy and sell both their sorry asses. Money is the only real superpower.
Batman isn't short of a few bucks himself...
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: rabid_fox on December 31, 2007, 12:33:29 AM

You're right. They'd have a party that would include expensive and obscure alcohols and, more than likely, ice sculptures.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Netrogo on December 31, 2007, 08:12:23 AM
Wish I'd noticed this thread sooner...

First and foremost, Batman beat Captain America in the Dc V Marvel comics. However the fight was to a stand still until they got flooded out *whole lot of water gushing into their fight area* at that point Cap threw his shield, Bats threw a Batarang (Both did so while being tossed about by the torrents of water) Cap's shield missed where Bat's batarang connected.

So in a level playing field they fight to a stand still, however throw in chaos (random events and such) and Batman keeps the more level head. This is no doubt due to the emotion factor though. When you look at the two characters the place where they differentiate the most is emotional. Cap was frequently shown using a wide range of emotions and often making his decisions based on those emotions (An example of this would be in Cable & Deadpool {Not sure which issue} Cap is sent to infiltrate Cable's island and let's his emotions get the better of him, thus getting schooled by Cable). Batman however has all the emotional range of the asian film market "Stolen From Zina Post As An Example" (http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1752315) so he's not one to let little things like the world coming to an end or random events stop him from seeing his primary goal.

To the people bringing up the Batman beat Superman example. That means nothing here, as frequently shown in the comics, a three year old with down syndrome and no legs could beat Superman with kryptonite. All times where Superman has been beaten by Batman (there's been a few) kryptonite has been involved. The only time this doesn't apply is in a Wizard Magazine article when interviewing a team from DC (can't remember who, too lazy to find the article) they did a 'Who would win in an all out JLA fight?" thing. In it the entire JLA of that time (Grant Morrison run, so the big seven Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Flash, Green Lantern, Aquaman, and The Martian Manhunter) in that run however it was at the time when Superman had a power shift into an energy being. Batman still came out on top, the last of which being him v Superman. His defeat of Superman was interesting, let's just say it involved ripped clothing and jumper cables (The sad thing is that ISN'T a joke).

Too early in the morning, need food. Will post more if necessary.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on January 10, 2008, 09:39:29 AM
Quote from: Netrogo on December 31, 2007, 08:12:23 AM
Wish I'd noticed this thread sooner...

First and foremost, Batman beat Captain America in the Dc V Marvel comics. However the fight was to a stand still until they got flooded out *whole lot of water gushing into their fight area* at that point Cap threw his shield, Bats threw a Batarang (Both did so while being tossed about by the torrents of water) Cap's shield missed where Bat's batarang connected.

So in a level playing field they fight to a stand still, however throw in chaos (random events and such) and Batman keeps the more level head. This is no doubt due to the emotion factor though. When you look at the two characters the place where they differentiate the most is emotional. Cap was frequently shown using a wide range of emotions and often making his decisions based on those emotions (An example of this would be in Cable & Deadpool {Not sure which issue} Cap is sent to infiltrate Cable's island and let's his emotions get the better of him, thus getting schooled by Cable). Batman however has all the emotional range of the asian film market "Stolen From Zina Post As An Example" (http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1752315) so he's not one to let little things like the world coming to an end or random events stop him from seeing his primary goal.

To the people bringing up the Batman beat Superman example. That means nothing here, as frequently shown in the comics, a three year old with down syndrome and no legs could beat Superman with kryptonite. All times where Superman has been beaten by Batman (there's been a few) kryptonite has been involved. The only time this doesn't apply is in a Wizard Magazine article when interviewing a team from DC (can't remember who, too lazy to find the article) they did a 'Who would win in an all out JLA fight?" thing. In it the entire JLA of that time (Grant Morrison run, so the big seven Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Flash, Green Lantern, Aquaman, and The Martian Manhunter) in that run however it was at the time when Superman had a power shift into an energy being. Batman still came out on top, the last of which being him v Superman. His defeat of Superman was interesting, let's just say it involved ripped clothing and jumper cables (The sad thing is that ISN'T a joke).

Too early in the morning, need food. Will post more if necessary.
Wow. Very detailed. I never had a chance to read the DC-Marvel crossover but now I'll have to find it somewhere. I need to know just what was going on. Also there was a time when the two teamed up because Red Skull and Joker teamed up as well.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: TheGreyRonin on January 10, 2008, 03:04:04 PM
The problem with DC/Marvel crossovers is that neither side is willing to give ground, so almost everything ends up either a tie, or both sides realize that they're both heroes and just stop fighting.

Captain America is stronger, faster, and tougher than Batman. Flat out. In a sudden, unprepared match, especially unarmed, Captain America would flatten Batman. Fighting skills notwithstanding, Batman is still fully human, Captain America, strictly speaking, is not thanks to the super-soldier serum.

On the other hand, Batman's greatest weapon is his mind. He can outthink nearly any opponent he comes across, and can handily defeat enemies far more powerful than he is by doing so. If he knew in advance the fight was coming, Batman would drop Captain America. Probably without ever even touching him.

On a semi-related note, much has been made of Batman's hand-to-hand combat abilities. I recall that at one point DC did a crossover series that had Batman fighting Aliens, and defeated one in close combat without weapons.
I know it's a comic, but there's no canon way Batman could do that. Just an observation that Batman's vaunted fighting skills tend to be improved at random so he can win any fight.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: LionHeart on January 11, 2008, 06:55:35 AM
I remember reading somewhere that Batman has mastered something like 128 different martial arts styles, so he can use elements of any of them against an opponent.

Captain America and Batman are both extremely capable physically, but neither one (as far as I know) has actual super powers. The Captain got his physique from the Super-soldier serum, Batman developed his through about 20 years of relentless training.

For comparison:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_america

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on January 11, 2008, 08:54:12 AM
Quote from: LionHeart on January 11, 2008, 06:55:35 AM
Captain America and Batman are both extremely capable physically, but neither one (as far as I know) has actual super powers.

That was kinda one of the reasons I think it would be a great face off. They are both extremely physically capable, but not so much to the point that they're super human.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: lucas marcone on January 11, 2008, 11:08:23 AM
captain america. one call and a quin jet later and batman would be six feet under. go team avenger!
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: Rakala on January 11, 2008, 11:52:13 AM
Quote from: lucas marcone on January 11, 2008, 11:08:23 AM
captain america. one call and a quin jet later and batman would be six feet under. go team avenger!
Forget the other avengers for this particular topic. Just Captain AMerica.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: TheGreyRonin on January 11, 2008, 12:01:53 PM
Quote from: LionHeart on January 11, 2008, 06:55:35 AM
I remember reading somewhere that Batman has mastered something like 128 different martial arts styles, so he can use elements of any of them against an opponent.

Captain America and Batman are both extremely capable physically, but neither one (as far as I know) has actual super powers. The Captain got his physique from the Super-soldier serum, Batman developed his through about 20 years of relentless training.

To the first point: And Captain America is a trained, combat-experienced soldier. I'm guessing he's picked up a bit along the way himself, but Batman's ridiculous-level training might make a difference.

To the second: Captain America was dropped into really cold water with no protection and froze, thawing out fifty years later with no serious side effects. Even comic book physics doesn't allow for that to be anything but a superhuman ability. *shrugs* Sorry, but it you want fully human-on-human without augmentation, better call in the Punisher to duke it out, Not Captain America.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: lucas marcone on January 11, 2008, 01:24:25 PM
well i suppose if batman could get ahold of a magnatism generator he could just do to cap A what magneto did to him in marvel zombies(he sent the shield right back through caps skull. but being a zombie and only loseing part of his brain cap A survived.)


but short of that cap A is stronger, faster, war ready, and willing to die for his country. if the government convinces him batman is a terrorist batman is dead no matter how you look at it.
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on January 11, 2008, 01:31:34 PM
Quote from: lucas marcone on January 11, 2008, 01:24:25 PM
but short of that cap A is stronger, faster, war ready, and willing to die for his country. if the government convinces him batman is a terrorist batman is dead no matter how you look at it.

... and Superman is stronger, faster, war-ready, and was hypnotised into being ready to die for killing Batman. And who won?
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: lucas marcone on January 11, 2008, 01:33:52 PM
but how did he win? kryptonite? i mean come on it's the lameist weakness in comic book history! he'll have to think of something much better to get cap A
Title: Re: Completely irrelevant to everything question.
Post by: llearch n'n'daCorna on January 11, 2008, 02:08:08 PM
The point is not that he won by using Kryptonite. The point is that a) he investigated the weakness beforehand, and planned ahead, and b) he used the battle to also break the hypnotic effect, and c) he also used the battle to short out power to the city, which had other beneficial effects on his plans.

As has been pointed out previously, it's not that he used Kryptonite. It's that he planned ahead, and understands the weaknesses of his target - enemy or not.