http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/pinko.htm
there is more than just pinko so feel free st share past experences with the forum fighters.
I wonder if anyone would get mad at me if I said Ms Amber could qualify as a Godfather (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/godfather.htm)
We lack any empyrical evidence... quick, someone get a newb to disagree with Amber so we can see if anyone tries to :noobrape
Heh heh anyways..I dont disagree with you with the godfather bit
I think I might be a Big cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm)
I'd say my posting style, here atleast is more playful then serous, even in serous discussions I'm still mostly trying to have fun. Only a few things realy get me hot and bothered.
I'd say I'm more Big Cat than Eagle Scout with a dash of Jerk. ;)
Sadly, I think I fall under Yuk Yuk (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/yukyuk.htm)
It's me! (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/artfuldodger.htm)
yes, I do think I'm a bit of artful dodger mixed with a bit of Philosopher.
I'm not on there, so I'll make my own. (Note: the description is not me, but a stylized and humorous depiction of the category)
Reference Librarian
Not quite as well-read as Philosopher, but unlike Profundus Maximus, will occasionally admit where his knowledge ends. This admission usually takes the form of long lists of references and footnotes. He will painstakingly research any fact, figure, or passing reference, but will rarely comment on or analyze these figures. Reference Librarian rarely makes a statement of position, and often will claim to be arguing in favor of positions contrary to his own. This allows Reference Librarian to claim victory no matter which side wins.
Unless you have hours of time and access to the Bodleian Library, do not engage Reference Librarian. Under no circumstances should you allow Reference Librarian to agree with you.
Eagle Scout (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/eaglescout.htm)? Really?
Admin (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/admin.htm) by definition, I think. Either that or Royals (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/royals.htm)
Although I suspect Nanny (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/nanny.htm) or Grammarian (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/grammarian.htm) or Propeller Head (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/propellerhead.htm) might be more accurate. ;-]
It'd be nice to be Kung Fu master (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm) or Philosopher (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/philosopher.htm) but I doubt I can keep my mouth shut long enough... :-]
Yeah I think I fall under Big Cat too, most of the time at least.
I'm some strange freak mix of a good majority of those... And I have no idea where I fall... It changes every time. Especially mid-"battle".
Quote from: Aridas Soulfire on March 13, 2007, 10:24:02 AM
I'm some strange freak mix of a good majority of those... And I have no idea where I fall... It changes every time. Especially mid-"battle".
Same. It's hard to define yourself when you act differently depending on what you are discussing and maybe even what forum you are on.
My friend showed this to me a while ago. Here's me: http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/philosopher.htm (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/philosopher.htm)
I believe the issue with these is not that you define yourself - nobody can define themselves.
The issue is, what do the rest of the forum think you are. And, I suppose, what do you think the rest of the forum thinks you are....
Of course, that's not usually very good for your ego, since most people like to think of themselves as being on the good side, rather than the evil one. Pity their behaviour seems, on balance, to prove the reverse....
True enough Llearch so for fun I offer up myself as a target.
What do you good folks think I am?
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 13, 2007, 03:46:11 PMThe issue is, what do the rest of the forum think you are. And, I suppose, what do you think the rest of the forum thinks you are....
I'm curious as to which one everybody thinks I am.
BTW, llearch, you can't be grammarian unless you can spot the grammatical error under Royals.
This could easily be converted to a game for the Arena...
Quote from: superluser on March 13, 2007, 06:10:44 PM
BTW, llearch, you can't be grammarian unless you can spot the grammatical error under Royals.
You mean the optional commas missing from the first sentence? Or the clumsy double-use of "While" to start two consecutive sentences, when it probably shouldn't start any? .... :-]
Quote from: llearch n'n'daCorna on March 13, 2007, 06:31:23 PMYou mean the optional commas missing from the first sentence? Or the clumsy double-use of "While" to start two consecutive sentences, when it probably shouldn't start any? .... :-]
Those are stylistic concerns. I note that Fowler (in his Dictionary of Modern English Usage) begins a few sentences with `While' in his entry on the term.
No, I was referring to ``from the hoi polloi.'' Hoi means `the,' so it should be ``from hoi polloi.'' Evans (in his Dictionary of Contemporary American Usage) states that ``It is a good phrase not to use.''
Yes and no. In the original language, sure, "hoi" means the. In contemporary usage, in civilised countries, "hoi polloi" is a phrased used to mean the teeming masses, and, as English is wont to do, requires a "the" as a prefix.
This is called "stealing verbs from other languages" - or "Business as usual" for English... :-]
Heh, I think I've been a bunch of these at different points. Then again, most people probably have. Cool stuff.
This is almost as old as the Internet.
It is about twice the size it was 5 years or so ago.
Quote from: thegayhare on March 13, 2007, 12:35:20 AM
I think I might be a Big cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm)
I'd say my posting style, here atleast is more playful then serous, even in serous discussions I'm still mostly trying to have fun. Only a few things realy get me hot and bothered.
You, good sir, are a wabbit. But also a Picador:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/picador.htm
A Picador realy?
Hmm I wouldn't have thought I was that provocitive or that good at deflection.
*chuckles*
Me either....
Always interesting finding out what others think, isn't it? :-)
Quote from: thegayhare on March 14, 2007, 10:22:20 PMA Picador realy?
Hmm I wouldn't have thought I was that provocitive or that good at deflection.
You don't necessarily have to be good at deflection, just be willing to prod the bulls. You can provoke people sometimes. I like to think that I can see it, especially in hindsight.
I'd put you somewhere between Big Cat and Picador, since your provocation is often playful, and I doubt it's malicious.
Hmm I can see that, A big cat with Picodor tendancies or maybe the other way around
Well I'll post my first call
I'm saying Tapewolf seems to fall in to the roll of an Archivist (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm)
Quote from: thegayhare on March 14, 2007, 11:11:20 PMI'm saying Tapewolf seems to fall in to the roll of an Archivist (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/archivist.htm)
He and llearch.
No calls for me? The closest I've found is Eagle Scout, and I'm darned sure that most of you would disagree with calling me that.
What about me? I'm giving you all free reign to evaluate me.
I haven't gone through all of them, yet, but I haven't really seen any to describe you, Superluser.
I remember reading through those way back, and trying to figure out what I was. Anyone feel free to tell me what you think I am. I won't say waht I thought I was because... 1: I don't want to prejudice anyopne, and 2: Darned if I can remember myself. :rolleyes
Hehe, these are pretty hilarious. I don't see any that fit me very well, though. Rather, I have varied traits from several of them. I have a bit of a variation of Fragile Femme, but I tend to keep that out of my posts. I can be Philosopher-ish, depending on the topic. But I'd say I'm mostly a cross between Diplomat and Bliss Ninny. And some of Big Cat, too.
Im happy to think I lie somewhere between Palooka and Target :B. I'm just a total NET RAT and have Android or Bliss Ninny tendencies (what is this sarcasm you speak of?)c:.
Lastly, just as a warning, if I wanted to I could go completely Therapist on all ya'll, and do a good job of it to. :evil
Question: What the hell is Mr. Stygian? :confused needs his own catagory I say.
*coughroyalcough*
Quote from: Density D. on March 15, 2007, 05:01:03 AMQuestion: What the hell is Mr. Stygian?
Evil clown (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm).
You all can evaluate me. Through a bit of self-examination, I would surmise that I'm somewhere between Big Cat (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/bigcat.htm) and Jekyl and Hyde (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/jekylhyde.htm)... with a little bit of Tireless Rebutter (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/tirelessrebutter.htm) thrown in for good measure.
Yay I'm a troll.
I definitely think I'm a mixture of Pinko (to a SEVERE extent), Jekyll and Hyde (at least sometimes), and maybe Big Cat. XD I dunno. It's kinda hard for me to find something which fits me. I wonder if there's an option for "Insane Bipolar Jackal RP-and-Yaoi-aholic".
Anybody who wants to--go ahead and categorize me =3
~Keaton the Black Jackal
Quote from: Keaton the Black Jackal on March 16, 2007, 04:55:57 PMI definitely think I'm a mixture of Pinko (to a SEVERE extent), Jekyll and Hyde (at least sometimes), and maybe Big Cat.
Huh? I've never seen any of those attributes for you. I don't think I've ever heard you discuss economics, so pinko would be out. And you don't seem to have any sort of Jekyll and Hyde mood swings...
Bliss Ninny?
Well, I know which one I'd like to be...
Quote from: superluser on March 16, 2007, 07:05:55 PM
Quote from: Keaton the Black Jackal on March 16, 2007, 04:55:57 PMI definitely think I'm a mixture of Pinko (to a SEVERE extent), Jekyll and Hyde (at least sometimes), and maybe Big Cat.
Huh? I've never seen any of those attributes for you. I don't think I've ever heard you discuss economics, so pinko would be out. And you don't seem to have any sort of Jekyll and Hyde mood swings...
Bliss Ninny?
I'm sort of judging myself based on experiences from other forums. Though Bliss Ninny seems like me. XD
~Keaton the Black Jackal
Perhaps I flatter myself with the title Big Cat? Bliss Ninny applies also.
Anyone like to say which one they think I am?
As for myself I think I fall some where around these three, but then again I'm probably a little bias.
Eagle Scout (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/eaglescout.htm)
Kung-Fu Masters (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/kungfumaster.htm)
Philosopher (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/philosopher.htm)
Quote from: Reese Tora on March 13, 2007, 12:21:22 AM
We lack any empyrical evidence... quick, someone get a newb to disagree with Amber so we can see if anyone tries to :noobrape
If handled wrong that could invoke a Swarm (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/swarm.htm).
Why hello there. (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/capitalista.htm)
I guess for Royals around here we've got Ink, Wildy, Azlan, and Shades. Any others?
Pretty simple: Capitalista
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/capitalista.htm (http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/capitalista.htm)
For all of those claiming capitalista, ask yourself--how often do you cite economic statistics, and how often do you talk about the free market on this forum? Infrequently or never? Not a capitalista.
For example, I'm a registered Libertarian and I firmly believe in it. But how often do I talk about economics here? In real life, I'm pretty much a Capitalista, and on another mailing list, that's pretty much the role that I take on.
But here? I'm pretty far from it. Alondro would be the only capitalista that I can think of.
I am a bit unsure, so would anyone have the "courtesy" and point me out? [vicious smirk]
Yes, I know the fact that I am not taking this seriously and just wasting time qualifies me as a bit of a Big Cat, but it wouldn't be honest to use tricks like that...
Huh... Yanno, despite the obvious Weenie, eagle scout and pinko jokes I want to make, you really strike me as a Jekyl and Hyde sorta guy, Styg. That is to say, on the occasion that you actually do lose your temper (which I've seen twice, tops, in the RP forums) it can be unexpected.
Quote from: Stygian on March 18, 2007, 11:01:33 AMI am a bit unsure, so would anyone have the "courtesy" and point me out?
Yaknow, I said before I had you pegged as ``Evil clown.''
``very quick with a joke, but his jests always have a barb.'' Check. ``greatest thrill is to taunt and humiliate weaker or more plodding Warriors with his snappy ripostes.'' Check.
Plus, I think one of your old avatars looks a lot like the picture.
I'd agree with you superluser, but
QuoteHe has little patience for in-depth discussions and will often disrupt exchanges between serious forum participants by introducing irrelevant topics, fatuous quips, and offhand comments.
doesn't seem to quite fit. Otherwise, sure.
Quote from: Eibbor_N on March 18, 2007, 11:54:28 PMI'd agree with you superluser, but QuoteHe has little patience for in-depth discussions and will often disrupt exchanges between serious forum participants by introducing irrelevant topics, fatuous quips, and offhand comments.
doesn't seem to quite fit. Otherwise, sure.
Well, yeah. That's why I didn't quote that part. Thing is, Stygian has a way of introducing anecdotes into serious discussions, and people wind up saying ``Uh, yeah, that happened to you, but I'm not sure if that's generalizable.''
Who cares if it's generalizable? It's perspective nonetheless. The human tendency to generalize excessively often stems from stupidity or short-sighted- and narrow-mindedness. Something I do not like to relate to.
Also, Evil Clown might fit well, but do I ever come off as irrelevant or snappy? And why the Pinko remark and the Weenie? Sensitive male feminist... pech...
I would not be so evil as to call you an Ideologue. More of an off mix between one and a Philosopher.
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 01:00:11 PM
And why the Pinko remark and the Weenie? Sensitive male feminist... pech...
Because it's funny. Why else?
Quote from: Boogeyman on March 19, 2007, 02:03:12 PM
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 01:00:11 PM
And why the Pinko remark and the Weenie? Sensitive male feminist... pech...
Because it's funny. Why else?
Thou shalt not call me a sissy, lest you want to be twisted and broken in unfathomably horrible ways!
No, really. I am quite in touch with my feminine side. It's just that she's just as much a horrible bitch as I am a hard-assed bastard. [
sneers]
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 03:55:49 PM
Thou shalt not call me a sissy, lest you want to be twisted and broken in unfathomably horrible ways!
Oooo, do you promise?
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: Boogeyman on March 19, 2007, 02:03:12 PM
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 01:00:11 PM
And why the Pinko remark and the Weenie? Sensitive male feminist... pech...
Because it's funny. Why else?
Thou shalt not call me a sissy, lest you want to be twisted and broken in unfathomably horrible ways!
No, really. I am quite in touch with my feminine side. It's just that she's just as much a horrible bitch as I am a hard-assed bastard. [sneers]
Hey, yo, Sissy. Over here. We gots some skirts and panties for you.
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 01:00:11 PMAlso, Evil Clown might fit well, but do I ever come off as irrelevant or snappy?
Er...
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 03:55:49 PMThou shalt not call me a sissy, lest you want to be twisted and broken in unfathomably horrible ways!
Moving on...
Quote from: Stygian on March 19, 2007, 01:00:11 PMI would not be so evil as to call you an Ideologue. More of an off mix between one and a Philosopher.
Is that aimed at me? I'm curious as to what you think my ideology is.
I was referring to your manner of approach, not the whole ideology part of it. That is only a central part to idiots who let themselves be led and told what to think and do, rather than form their own opinion.
what am i? feel free to be honest.